Abstract:SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 1587-1618, September 2024. The choice of the sensing matrix is crucial in compressed sensing. Random Gaussian sensing matrices satisfy the restricted isometry property, which is crucial for solving the sparse recovery problem using convex optimization techniques. However, tight-frame sensing matrices result in minimum mean-squared-error recovery given oracle knowledge of the support of the sparse vector. If the sensing matrix is not tight, could one achieve the recovery performance assured by a tight frame by suitably designing the recovery strategy? This is the key question addressed in this paper. We consider the analysis-sparse [math]-minimization problem with a generalized [math]-norm-based data-fidelity and show that it effectively corresponds to using a tight-frame sensing matrix. The new formulation offers improved performance bounds when the number of nonzeros is large. One could develop a tight-frame variant of a known sparse recovery algorithm using the proposed formalism. We solve the analysis-sparse recovery problem in an unconstrained setting using proximal methods. Within the tight-frame sensing framework, we rescale the gradients of the data-fidelity loss in the iterative updates to further improve the accuracy of analysis-sparse recovery. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms offer superior analysis-sparse recovery performance. Proceeding further, we also develop deep-unfolded variants, with a convolutional neural network as the sparsifying operator. On the application front, we consider compressed sensing image recovery. Experimental results on Set11, BSD68, Urban100, and DIV2K datasets show that the proposed techniques outperform the state-of-the-art techniques, with performance measured in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index metric.

Sparse recovery with general frame via general-dual-based analysis Dantzig selector

Sparse Recovery with Coherent Tight Frame via Analysis Dantzig Selector and Analysis LASSO

I T ] 8 S ep 2 01 3 Sparse Recovery with Coherent Tight Frames via Analysis Dantzig Selector and Analysis LASSO ∗

Analysis Recovery with Coherent Frames and Correlated Measurements

Nonuniform Recovery of Fusion Frame Structured Sparse Signals

Compressed Sensing Via Dual Frame Based $\ell_{1}$ -Analysis with Weibull Matrices

New Bounds for Restricted Isometry Constants with Coherent Tight Frames

Stable recovery of sparse signals with coherent tight frames via lp-analysis approach

Analysis Non-Sparse Recovery for Relaxed ALASSO

Compressed Data Separation Via Dual Frames Based Split-Analysis with Weibull Matrices

Sparse Recovery for Overcomplete Frames: Sensing Matrices and Recovery Guarantees

Signal Recovery with Partially Known Signal Support

Low Rank Matrix Recovery with Adversarial Sparse Noise

Tight-frame-like Analysis-Sparse Recovery Using Non-tight Sensing Matrices

Tight-Frame-Like Analysis-Sparse Recovery Using Nontight Sensing Matrices

Recovery of Sparsely Corrupted Signals

On unified view of nullspace-type conditions for recoveries associated with general sparsity structures

Sparse Recovery of Fusion Frame Structured Signals

A Unified Recovery of Structured Signals Using Atomic Norm

Sequential Testing for Sparse Recovery

Sparse Recovery from Combined Fusion Frame Measurements