Abstract:The objective of this randomized controlled experiment was to evaluate the effect of delaying induction of ovulation and timed artificial insemination (TAI) on expression of estrus before AI and first service reproductive outcomes. A secondary objective was to evaluate the effects of delaying induction of ovulation in a Double-Ovsynch protocol on ovarian function. Lactating Holstein cows (n = 4,672) from 2 commercial dairy farms fitted with sensors for automated detection of estrus were synchronized with a Double-Ovsynch protocol up to the first PGF2α (PGF-L) of the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of the protocol (Pre-Ovsynch: GnRH, 7 d later PGF2α, 3 d later GnRH, 7 d later Breeding-Ovsynch: GnRH, 7 d later PGF2α, 1 d later PGF2α). At PGF-L, cows blocked by parity (primiparous vs. multiparous) and semen used for first service (sex-sorted dairy vs. conventional beef) were randomly assigned to the G56 (n = 2,338) or G80 (n = 2,334) treatments. Cows in G56 had 56 h whereas cows in G80 had 80 h from PGF-L to induction of ovulation with the last GnRH (GnRH2) before AI. For both treatments, TAI occurred ∼16 h after GnRH2. All cows with automated estrus alerts between PGF-L and TAI were inseminated at detected estrus (AIE) without GnRH. Ovarian function and responses to synchronization were monitored based on circulating concentrations of progesterone and examination of the ovaries by ultrasonography. Data for binary outcomes were analyzed by logistic and continuous outcomes with lineal regression. More cows in G80 received AIE and had estrus before AI. Overall, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ for the G80 and G56 treatments. Cows in G80 that received TAI and had no estrus had fewer P/AI than cows with estrus that received AIE or TAI in G80, and fewer P/AI than cows AIE and cows that received TAI and had or did not have estrus in the G56 treatment. No differences were observed between treatments or for cows with and without estrus for pregnancy loss. Unlike some minor differences between treatments for concentrations of progesterone at GnRH2, the most notable differences in ovarian function were for cows in both treatments with or without estrus that received TAI. Cows with estrus, were more likely to have follicles > 16 mm, had larger follicles before ovulation, and had a greater ovulation risk after AI. Likewise, within the G80 treatment only, cows with estrus that received AIE or TAI had larger follicles, were more likely to have complete luteal regression, had greater ovulation risk, were more likely to have a functional corpus luteum, and had more circulating progesterone after AI. We concluded that delaying induction of ovulation and TAI was effective for allowing more cows to express estrus before AI which had different ovarian function outcomes and greater P/AI than cows that did not express estrus. However, the greater P/AI of cows that expressed estrus was insufficient to compensate for the reduced P/AI of cows that did not express estrus, and thus increase overall P/AI compared with the treatment without delayed induction of ovulation. Detection of estrus before AI in cows undergoing synchronization of ovulation could help identify cows with different likelihoods of pregnancy after insemination.

Factors affecting estrus and ovulation time in weaned sows with induced ovulation by GnRH administration in different seasons

Ovulation induction protocol using equine chorionic gonadotropin and porcine luteinizing hormone in the weaned sow

PSXIII-39 Onset of ovulation in suckled cows treated with progesterone and estradiol benzoate

Interval from Oestrus to Ovulation in Dairy Cows-A Key Factor for Insemination Time: A Review

Evaluation of the efficiency of estrus synchronization protocols combined with natural service and ultrasonography on ewe reproductive performance during non-breeding season

A STUDY OF SEASONAL EFFECT ON SYNCHRONIZATION OF ESTRUS USING CIDR IN GOAT

Control of estrus and ovulation: Fertility to timed insemination of gilts and sows

Estrous Synchronization Efficiency of Buserelin of Different Doses in Combination with Mifepristone and Timed Artificial Insemination in Holstein Cattle

Effect of progesterone infused controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) device and timing of gonadotropin stimulation using P.G. 600 on reproductive success in ewes bred out of season

Potency evaluation of different GNRH analogues on ovulation induction and reproductive performance of doe rabbit

Metabolomics analysis of the effect of GnRH on the pregnancy rate of ewes with estrus synchronization scheme based on progesterone

Comparison of different treatments for oestrous induction in seasonally anovulatory mares

Delaying induction of ovulation and timed AI in a Double-Ovsynch protocol increased expression of estrus and altered first service reproductive outcomes of lactating dairy cows

Effects of Hormones on Artificial Inducing Estrus and Synchronized Estrus of Yorkshire Sows

Effect of 200 μg of gonadorelin hydrochloride at the first GnRH of a CO-Synch program on ovulation rate and pregnancies per artificial insemination in Holstein heifers

Comparison of the effect of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone and Human Chorionic Go3nadotropin on Reproductive Performance of Romanov Ewes During the Natural Breeding Season

Prolonging the time of semen deposition increases the pregnancy rates of ewes subjected to fixed time cervical insemination during the breeding season

Pattern of induced estrus and conception rate following Ovsynch and Ovsynch based gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatments initiated on day 6 of estrous cycle in repeat breeding crossbred cows

Ovarian activity in dairy Saanen goats subjected to a short-term ovulation induction protocol and a single injection of lecirelin (GnRH analog) given 28 h or 34 h after progestin pre-treatment

The Effect of Prolactin on Gene Expression and the Secretion of Reproductive Hormones in Ewes during the Estrus Cycle

PSV-A-1 Estrus Response and Pregnancy Rates of Beef Cows Enrolled in two Fixed-Time Artificial Insemination Protocols, with or without pre-Synchronization