Abstract:Intersectionality theory examines how matrices of power and interlocking structures of oppression shape and influence people's multiple identities. It reminds us that people's lives cannot be explained by taking into account single categories, such as gender, race, sexuality, or socio-economic status. Rather, human lives are multi-dimensional and complex, and people's lived realities are shaped by different factors and social dynamics operating together. Therefore, when someone occupies multiple marginalized intersections, their individual-level experiences reflect social and structural systems of power, privilege, and inequality. And yet, knowing that people occupy different social locations that afford them unique experiences is not the same as knowing how to analyze data in an intersectional way. Intersectional analyses are rigorous, and require the use of theory at multiple levels to see theoretical connections that are often only implicit.In this paper, we ask "How does one actually do intersectional research and what role does theory play in this process?" In an effort to make intersectionality theory more accessible to health professions education research, this article describes the simpler version of intersectional analyses followed by the more complex version representing how it was originally intended to be used; a means to fight for social justice. Using pilot data collected on first-generation medical students' professional identity experiences, we demonstrate the thinking and engagement with theory that would be needed to do an intersectional analysis. Along the way, we describe some of the challenges researchers may find in using intersectionality in their own work. By re-situating the theory within its original roots of Black feminist thought, we hope other health professions education (HPE) researchers consider using intersectionality in their own analyses.

Marxism and Intersectionality

Marxism as a part of the androcentric tradition: The feminist superstructure and the androcentric base

Marxism Beyond the Economy and Exploitation Beyond the Wage

Marxism and Postcolonial Theory: What’s Left of the Debate?

Marxist State Theory in a Globalized Age

Marxism and Cotemporary Left-wing Trends

The metaphysics of intersectionality

Hierarchies of knowledge about intersectionality in marketing theory and practice

Marxism and the Concept of a Social Formation: An Immanent Critique of the Views of Jairus Banaji

Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Examples Informed by a Decade of Collaborative Work With Majority World Women’s Grassroots Activism

Introducing Marxist Literary Criticism

The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more Progressive Union

The Politics of the Concept of Totality

Intersectionality: a means for centering power and oppression in research

Theory: the Three Critical Dimensions of Marx's Philosophy

Marxism in IR: Condemned to a Realist fate?

Materiality and Subject in Marxism, (Post-)Structuralism, and Material Semiotics

Political Marxism and the Rules of Reproduction of Capitalism: A Historicist Critique

The Emergent Body: Marxism, Critical Realism and the Corporeal in Contemporary Capitalist Society

Refocusing Intersectionality in Social Work Education: Creating a Brave Space to Discuss Oppression and Privilege

The Concept of Intersectionality in Feminist Theory