Correlation between Skeletal Muscle Mass and Adverse Events of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Norihiro Matsuura,Masaaki Motoori,Kazumasa Fujitani,Yujiro Nishizawa,Hisateru Komatsu,Yasuhiro Miyazaki,Susumu Miyazaki,Akira Tomokuni,Takamichi Komori,Kazuhiro Iwase
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000502613
2019-09-11
Oncology
Abstract:<span><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Severe toxicity associated with the treatment may reduce the dose intensity of chemotherapy, resulting in the effect of chemotherapy being attenuated. Recently, skeletal muscle mass has been reported to be associated with the treatment outcomes of cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether pretreatment skeletal muscle mass is a predictor of adverse events as well as the relationship between changes in skeletal muscle mass and adverse events during NAC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This study included 41 advanced gastric cancer patients who were treated with NAC followed by surgery. Body composition was assessed before and after NAC. The relationship between the pre-NAC body composition and adverse events was investigated as well as the relationship between changes in body composition and adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that low pre-NAC skeletal muscle mass was the only factor significantly associated with severe diarrhea (<i>p</i> = 0.03). There was no significant difference in body weight before and after NAC, but skeletal muscle mass was significantly reduced after NAC (–5.93 ± 7.69%, <i>p</i> #x3c; 0.01). Furthermore, patients who experienced severe diarrhea showed significantly greater relative skeletal muscle decrease than those who did not (<i>p</i> = 0.03). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Pre-NAC low skeletal muscle mass was a useful predictor of severe diarrhea. Prevention of severe adverse events may contribute to maintaining the skeletal muscle mass.<br/>Oncology</span>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?