Abstract:Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) provides insight into white matter (WM) microstructural changes in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative’s (ADNI) has currently extended its ADNI3 imaging protocol to include dMRI from Siemens, Philips and General Electric (GE) scanners, resulting in seven vendor‐specific dMRI acquisition protocols (Table1). Here we present the updated ADNI3 preprocessing pipeline1 (Figure1) for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics made available via ADNI’s database, and evaluate their utility for detecting WM differences associated with clinical impairment. Raw dMRI downloaded from ADNI are first denoised using DiPy’s principal component analysis (PCA) denoising algorithms: local PCA for zero‐padded k‐space data (GE), or Marchenko‐Pastur PCA for data with the original acquisition matrix (Siemens/Philips). dMRI are then corrected for Gibbs ringing, eddy currents using FSL’s eddy_cuda with repol outlier estimation and slice‐to‐volume correction, intensity inhomogeneity with ANTS N4, and echo‐planar imaging distortions with a three‐channel non‐linear registration of the subject‐level preprocessed average B0 image to the subject’s skull‐stripped T1‐weighted MRI. Bias field correction is applied again to dMRI with FSL‐FAST. DTI fractional anisotropy (FA), axial, mean and radial diffusivity (AxD, MD, RD) are estimated with FSL’s dtifit, using weighted least squares. The JHU ICBM‐DTI‐81 atlas FA is warped to subject‐level FA maps using ANTS, and the transformations are applied to atlas labels. Subject‐level mean and robust mean (using M‐estimator from R’s ‘WRS2’ package) of DTI metrics within 73 WM regions of interest (ROIs; Table2) are extracted. Here, we fit linear mixed effects models of diagnosis (N=733) and clinical dementia rating (CDR‐sob; N=682; Table3) in 28 of the 73 available ROIs, covarying for age, sex, age*sex, and including nested protocol|site variables as random effects; multiple comparisons were corrected for using false discovery rate (q=0.05). Lower anisotropy and greater diffusivity were associated with greater impairment, particularly in the hippocampal cingulum (Figure2). Results from mean and robust mean metrics were comparable. Overall, our results follow previous work2,3 using publicly available ADNI dMRI. Subject‐level ADNI3 dMRI measures, sensitive to clinical indices of impairment as presented here, are available at https://ida.loni.usc.edu/. References: [1 ]Thomopoulos (2021), https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2606337; [2] Nir (2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2013.07.006; [3] Zavaliangos‐Petropulu (2019), https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2019.00002.

Statistical significance in DTI group analyses: How the choice of the estimator can inflate effect sizes

Analysis of the effects of noise, DWI sampling, and value of assumed parameters in diffusion MRI models

Angular Resolution Enhancement of Diffusion MRI Data Using Inter-Subject Information Transfer.

Statistical Instability of TBSS Analysis Based on DTI Fitting Algorithm

Low Rank plus Sparse Decomposition of ODFs for Improved Detection of Group-level Differences and Variable Correlations in White Matter

Effects of Dementia and MCI on Diffusion Tensor Metrics Using the Updated ADNI3 DTI Preprocessing Pipeline

Determining the OPTIMAL DTI analysis method for application in cerebral small vessel disease

Same Brain, Different Look?—The Impact of Scanner, Sequence and Preprocessing on Diffusion Imaging Outcome Parameters

Improving Estimation of Fiber Orientations in Diffusion MRI Using Inter-Subject Information Sharing

Impact of analytic decisions on test-retest reliability of individual and group estimates in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a multiverse analysis using the monetary incentive delay task

Multivariate statistical analysis of diffusion imaging parameters using partial least squares: Application to white matter variations in Alzheimer's disease

Small effect size leads to reproducibility failure in resting-state fMRI studies

Quality Control of Diffusion Weighted Images.

False discovery rate analysis of brain diffusion direction maps

Improving Microstructural Estimation in Time‐Dependent Diffusion MRI With a Bayesian Method

Exploring the Potential of Machine Learning Algorithms to Improve Diffusion Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging Models Analysis

Comparison of a non-stationary voxelation-corrected cluster-size test with TFCE for group-Level MRI inference.

More with less: Simulation-based inference enables accurate diffusion-weighted MRI with minimal acquisition time

Statistical power in quantitative diffusion MRI of tumor response: strategies for future studies

Towards Efficient FMRI Data Re-Use: Can We Run Between-Group Analyses with Datasets Processed Differently with SPM?

Modified test statistics by inter-voxel variance shrinkage with an application to f MRI.