Photosynthesis, growth, and biomass allocation responses of two Inga species to contrasting light

Hellen Ariadne dos Santos Pereira,Geane Santos da Costa,Ana Cristina Schilling,Marcelo Schramm Mielke,Maria Cristina Sanches,Ândrea Carla Dalmolin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2966-y
2019-09-24
Acta Physiologiae Plantarum
Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus"><em class="a-plus-plus">Inga marginata</em> and <em class="a-plus-plus">Inga subnuda</em> are evergreen N-fixing tree species that are frequently found in the initial stages of forest regeneration. <em class="a-plus-plus">I. marginata</em> has a wide geographic distribution, encompassing the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest and dry forests of central Brazil, whereas <em class="a-plus-plus">I. subnuda</em> is endemic to the Brazilian Atlantic Rainforest. We conducted this study to compare the physiological, growth, and biomass allocation responses of <em class="a-plus-plus">I. marginata</em> and <em class="a-plus-plus">I. subnuda</em> to contrasting light environments. Considering that <em class="a-plus-plus">I. marginata</em> and <em class="a-plus-plus">I. subnuda</em> have a similar position in the forest succession and different geographic distributions, we tested a hypothesis that these two congeneric species have similar photosynthetic and growth responses to light availability but different biomass allocation. The plants were grown under three light conditions (36, 15, and 6 mol photons m<sup class="a-plus-plus">−2</sup> day<sup class="a-plus-plus">−1</sup>) for 105 days. Growth, biomass allocation, light–response curves, and leaf pigments were compared among the light conditions and between species by using two-way ANOVA. Our hypothesis was partially supported because the two species had similar photosynthetic responses to changes in light availability, but differences in growth and biomass allocation. The higher relative growth rate in mass of <em class="a-plus-plus">I. subnuda</em> is associated with its higher allocation of biomass to light capture, as shown by the higher values of leaf mass fraction (LMF) and leaf area ratio (LAR). Conversely, the higher values of root mass fraction for <em class="a-plus-plus">I. marginata</em> were in contrast to the higher values of LMF, LAR, and specific leaf area for <em class="a-plus-plus">I. subnuda</em>; this indicates that <em class="a-plus-plus">I. marginata</em> should be better adapted to environments where water could be a limiting factor, which is consistent with its wide geographic distribution.</p>
plant sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?