Role of Zro2 and Ceo2 Support on the In2o3 Catalyst Activity for Co2 Hydrogenation

Derek Creaser,Poonam Sharma,Louise Olsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4087351
2022-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation has drawn global attention as catalytic CO2 hydrogenation is an attractive choice to mitigate CO2 emissions and lessen dependency on fossil resources. In the present study, we have synthesized ZrO2 and CeO2 supported In2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation and the catalytic performances of Inx/ZrO2, and Inx/CeO2 (x = 1% and 13%) were compared. Specifically, the effect of the ZrO2 and CeO2 supports on In2O3 catalyst during CO2 hydrogenation was explored. This study reveals that ZrO2 support increased the catalytic activity while the CeO2 support decreased although both supports have almost the same indium loading and surface area. Various characterizations like XRD, DRIFT, CO2-TPD, H2-TPR and XPS analysis of catalysts provided insight into changes that arise after mixing the two oxides and during the reaction as well as after the reaction. The stabilities of In2O3, In13/ZrO2 and In13/CeO2 were tested for up to 12 h and we found In2O3, In13/ZrO2 was stable during this time-on-stream, while In13/CeO2 lost activity after 2 h of reaction. XPS results of spent catalyst showed that the metal hydroxides increased significantly for the spent In13/CeO2. OH-groups were also verified by DRIFT experiments, however at low levels due to low CO2 conversion at atmospheric pressure. A regeneration study was carried out to regenerate the catalyst and the results showed that partial regeneration of the In13/CeO2 catalyst is possible by Ar flushing. We therefore suggest that the build-up of OH groups deactivate the In13/CeO2 catalyst and some of these OH groups could be removed during flushing with inert gas, causing a partial regeneration. However, the structural changes and decreased surface area is not reversible, and this results in a continuous decrease in activity of the catalyst after repeated experiments, even if the catalyst is flushed with Ar between the experiments.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?