Abstract:The ‘totalizing logic’1 of the Great War had for consequence to blur the boundaries between combatants and non-combatants, between ‘soldier and civilian’2. Pitting mass armies supported by industrialized economies, the conduct of the war first demanded the commitment of the nation’s material and technical resources to the conflict. The meaning of wartime mobilization thus shifted from its original military definition to encompass the contribution of civil society, whose human, financial, and cultural resources were also expected to directly support the armed forces in the field. At the same time, the new technologies of warfare allowed armies to overcome the physical limitations that had hitherto delineated a clear demarcation between the front and the rear. The development of modern artillery, of submarine warfare and aerial bombardments, like the experience of occupation, thus challenged the cultural and legal barriers which had aimed to protect civilians from the direct impact of military offensives. In the English language, the emergence of the notion of “home front”, first recorded by the Oxford English Dictionary in 1917, merely illustrated the acceleration of an ongoing process that the Second World War was to radicalize. The Wars of German Unification and the Franco-Prussian war in particular had indeed seen the word Heimatfront gain wide currency in the newly unified Germany3. In WWI Italy, fronte interno became a term of choice in interventionist and nationalist circles. In this context, as A. Gibelli points out, the notion conjured up the existence of an internal enemy whose activities should be met as resolutely as those of the enemy at the

Axis Prisoners of War

Britain, the United States, and the Question of Asylum for War Criminals in the Neutral Countries During World War II

[Commune prison camp's health care and Versailles military hospital share]

The Internment of Civilians by Belligerent States during the First World War and the Response of the International Committee of the Red Cross

The parcel is political: the British government and the regulation of food parcels for prisoners of war, 1914–1918

No Retaliation in Kind: Japanese Chemical Warfare Policy in World War II

Why Jewish Refugees Were Imprisoned in a Spanish Detention Camp while Fleeing Europe (1940–1945)

World War II: The defeat and occupation of France

Pierre Purseigle Between Participation and Victimization World War I Urban Mobilization in Comparative Perspective

From the horse's mouth: Luftwaffe POWs as sources for air ministry intelligence during the battle of Britain

France and Palestine: From Charles de Gaulle to Francois Mitterand

The Origins of Madness : Former prisoners of war in psychiatric care in the Hungarian Stalinist era

Neutrality in War

Heroes and Villains: The Effects of Combat Heroism on Autocratic Values and Nazi Collaboration in France

French military policy in the Nigerian Civil War, 1967–1970

Emile Borel's difficult days in 1941

Publier sous l'Occupation I. Autour du cas de Jacques Feldbau et de l'Académie des sciences

Entangled memories of violence: Jean Améry and Frantz Fanon

Pièces de résistance: The Dramas of Resistance and Torture in the Work of Jorge Semprún

THE BATTLE OF NATIONS IN THE OFFICIAL GERMAN DISCOURSE OF THE 20TH CENTURY: THE GERMANS AND THEIR ALLIES

War Imprisonment and Clinical Narratives of Psychiatric Illness, Psychiatric Hospital Charité, Berlin, 1948-1956