Challenges and Opportunities for Commercial-Scale Carbon Capture and Storage in Kansas

Yevhen Holubnyak,Martin Dubois,Jennifer Hollenbach,Franciszek Hasiuk
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/196186-ms
2019-09-23
Abstract:Abstract Results of the Integrated CCS for Kansas pre-feasibility study indicate that large-scale CO2 capture, transportation and storage in saline aquifers in Kansas is both technically and economically feasible and deserving of further study. Based on the technical work on multiple geologic sites, there appear to be up to four sites within the North Hugoton Storage Complex (NHSC) in Southwest Kansas where >50 million tons CO2 could be injected over a 25- to 30-year period and safely stored in a set of stacked saline aquifers at ideal depths of 5200-6400 ft. The saline aquifers (Mississippian Osage, Ordovician Viola, and Cambrian-Ordovician) are overlain by oil reservoirs that are candidates for CO2 Enhanced Oil recovery (EOR). Of the four possible sites in the NHSC, the Patterson site was chosen as the primary site for a CarbonSAFE Phase II project. Patterson was chosen because the operator of the overlying fields, Berexco, was a long-term research partner of the Kansas Geological Survey (KGS), having participated in several DOE-funded studies with the KGS. Patterson has EOR opportunities in overlying reservoirs and most of the prospective injection site is already unitized. Capture, compression and transportation of large volumes of CO2 is economic in the region, particularly since the extension and expansion of Federal 45Q tax credits in February 2018 that provide $35/ton for CO2 stored during EOR and $50/ton if stored in a saline reservoir and can be captured for a 12-year period. Without these credits, saline aquifer storage is not economically viable. The most economic scenario involves CO2 aggregated from multiple ethanol plants via small-diameter pipelines that tie into a main trunk line for delivery to market. CO2 EOR likely needs to be part of the system to provide economy of scale and, potentially, additional subsidy for saline aquifer injection through CO2 sales. High capture costs at the two power plants and refinery in this study make them non-economic options without further subsidy that may arise from a large regional pipeline system. Legal, regulatory, public policy aspects of a project of the scale envisioned will require significant changes at the State level. In particular, legislation that would regulate capture, transportation, injection and storage as a public utility would be required along with allowances for eminent domain to be used for pipeline right-of-way and pooling of pore space. Streamlining the U.S. EPA UIC Class VI well permit process and/or establishing State primacy would further support development of commercial-scale CCS. Effective public outreach is critical for support of State regulatory changes, and for public acceptance, particularly in light of possibility for induced seismicity due to injection in certain areas and mixed public opinions about pipeline construction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?