Abstract:ObjectivesThe study examined whether Assets Coming Together (ACT), a policing intervention directed at increasing collective action and collective efficacy at crime hot spots in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota, would have impacts on these outcomes, as well as police legitimacy, crime and fear of crime.MethodsWe used a block-randomized experimental design in which hot spots of crime were randomly allocated to treatment and control conditions. The treatment condition received the ACT program, and the control condition received normal police response. We analyzed crime data using an ANOVA approach, taking into account treatment and block. We analyzed survey data collected at each hot spot using mixed-effects linear regression models with robust standard errors to account for the nesting of responses within hot spots.ResultsWe find that the intervention increased citizen reporting of collective actions (including collaboration in problem solving and contacts with the police) at hot spots, but it had little impact on general measures of collective efficacy or police legitimacy. Fear of crime increased at the treatment sites. We found that crime reporting was significantly inflated in the treatment sites. Crime outcomes were non-significant without accounting for this reporting inflation, but the treatment areas had a significant crime decrease when adjusting estimates based on reporting inflation.ConclusionsOur experimental findings show that collective actions at hot spots can be encouraged through programs like ACT and that ordinary policing resources—patrol officers in this case—can be successfully used to carry out such programs. We find preliminary evidence that the program also impacted crime. At the same time, our study points to a bias in using official crime data to assess outcomes in programs that encourage community collaboration.

A field experiment on community policing and police legitimacy

Police compliance with the social contract as an antecedent of police legitimacy, of satisfaction with the police, and of willingness to obey: findings from a two-stage vignette experiment

Changing the Narrative: Police–Community Partnerships and Racial Reconciliation

Building collective action at crime hot spots: Findings from a randomized field experiment

Are Trustworthiness and Legitimacy ‘Hard to Win, Easy to Lose’? A Longitudinal Test of the Asymmetry Thesis of Police-Citizen Contact

Achieving Fairness in Policing

Doing the right thing? value conflicts and community policing

Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police

The Potential Impacts of Pandemic Policing on Police Legitimacy: Planning Past the COVID-19 Crisis

Examining the COMM in COMMunity Policing: Communication Accommodation, Perception, and Trust in Law Enforcement-Suspect Encounters

The Receptivity of Officers to Empirical Research and Evidence-Based Policing: An Examination of Survey Data From Three Agencies

Explaining Racial Differences in Ferguson’s Impact on Local Residents’ Trust and Perceived Legitimacy: Policy Implications for Police

Reforming the police through procedural justice training: A multicity randomized trial at crime hot spots

Public Satisfaction With Police: Using Procedural Justice to Improve Police Legitimacy

An international study on public confidence in police

Cops in crisis?: ethnographic insights on a new era of politicization, activism, accountability, and change in transatlantic policing

Leveraging body-worn camera footage to assess the effects of training on officer communication during traffic stops

Attitudes Toward the Police: The Effects of Direct and Vicarious Experience

Body-worn camera videos and public perceptions of police: an experiment on positive video exposure and community-police relations

Willingness to cooperate with police in hate crime cases: the impact of police legitimacy, police encounters and race/ethnicity

Policing the police: Why it is so hard to reform police departments in the United States?