Feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer

W.-C. Su,C.-W. Huang,C.-J. Ma,C. Po-Jung,H.-L. Tsai,T.-K. Chang,Y.-C. Chen,C.-C. Li,Y.-S. Yeh,J.-Y. Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz246.021
IF: 51.769
2019-10-01
Annals of Oncology
Abstract:<span class="paragraphSection">BackgroundAlthough surgical resection is the main treatment for rectal cancer, the optimal surgical protocol for elderly patients with rectal cancer remains controversial. Robot-assisted surgery has the following advantages: smaller wounds, less blood loss, quicker recovery, early recovery, and high rate of anal preservation. This study evaluated the feasibility of robot-assisted surgery in elderly patients with rectal cancer.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 125 patients aged 28–93 years diagnosed with stage I–III rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted surgery between May 2013 and April 2018 in a single institution.ResultsIn total, 125 patients with rectal cancer, including 100 nonelderly (aged &lt;70 years) and 25 elderly (aged ≥70 years) patients, who underwent robot-assisted surgery were recruited. Between the patient groups, the incidence of overall postoperative complications and postoperative length of hospital stay did not differ significantly (p = 0.930 and 0.095, respectively). No surgical related deaths were noted. The disease-free and overall survival did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (p = 0.610 and 0.298, respectively).ConclusionsRobot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer is an appropriate approach that is well tolerated in elderly patients, with similar results as for the non-elderly patients. Oncological outcomes, including postoperative complications and survival, did not depend on patient age. Thus, in elderly patients, robot-assisted surgery is a safe and feasible surgical modality for treating operable rectal cancer and leads to age-independent postoperative outcomes.Legal entity responsible for the studyWei-Chih Su.FundingKaohsiung Medical University Hospital.DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.</span>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?