Challenging a paradigm: skin sensitivity to sodium lauryl sulfate is independent of atopic diathesis

A.B. Heetfeld,T. Schill,S.S. Schröder,S. Forkel,V. Mahler,W. Pfützner,M.P. Schön,J. Geier,T. Buhl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18564
IF: 11.113
2019-11-24
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:BackgroundSodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is the best‐studied detergent in irritant contact dermatitis. In atopic dermatitis, the two major pathophysiological abnormalities concern skin barrier function and regulation of cutaneous immune responses. The probability of atopic skin diathesis can be assessed by comprehensive analysis of patient history as well as clinical and laboratory findings resulting in the Erlangen Atopy Score (EAS). ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of (i) atopic skin diathesis according to the EAS, and (ii) the physician‐assessed diagnoses "atopic dermatitis", "allergic rhinitis", and "allergic asthma" on SLS skin reactions. Patients and MethodsRetrospective analysis of data from 2,030 consecutive patients patch‐tested with SLS (0.25% aq.) from two tertiary referral centers in Germany, from 2008 to 2014. ResultsPatients with a high probability of atopic skin diathesis showed no significant increase in positive SLS reactions compared to patients without atopic skin diathesis (14.2 vs. 16.8%). The grading of positive SLS skin reactions (1‐4) revealed no differences in patients with or without atopic skin diathesis. Further, diagnoses of atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, or allergic asthma had no impact on positive SLS skin reactions in multivariate logistic regression analysis. ConclusionsWe found no association of increased skin irritability to SLS with atopic skin diathesis, atopic dermatitis, allergic rhinitis, or allergic asthma in a large patient cohort. It therefore seems that the test of skin irritability with SLS, which is common practice in many centers so far, does not allow to predict the susceptibility to irritant eczematous inflammation in atopic vs. non‐atopic individuals.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?