Abstract:Purpose This study aims to examine the link between boards and audit committees and firm performance in Kuwaiti listed firms in the context of recent and extensive corporate governance regulatory reform. Design/methodology/approach Panel data regression analysis with fixed effects and clustered standard errors of firm performance for 61–97 listed industrial and services firms in Kuwait over a seven-year period. The dependent variables are the returns on assets and equity, the debt-to-equity ratio and leverage and Tobin's Q and the independent variables comprise board of directors and audit committee characteristics, including size, the number of meetings and the numbers of independent and outside board and expert committee members. Firm size, subsidiary status and cash flow serve as control variables. Findings Mixed results with respect to the characteristics of the board of directors. Board size and independent and outsider board members positively relate only to Tobin's Q and insiders only to debt to equity. For audit committee characteristics, committee size, independence and expertise positively relate to the return on equity and committee size and expertise only to Tobin's Q. Of the five performance measures considered, board and audit committee characteristics together best determine Tobin's Q. Research limitations/implications Data from a single country limits generalisability and control variables necessarily limited in a developing market context. Need for qualitative insights into corporate governance reform as a complement to conventional quantitative analysis. In combining accounting and market information, Tobin's Q appears best able to recognise the performance benefits of good corporate governance in terms of internal organisational change. Practical implications The recent corporate governance code and guidelines reforms exert a mixed impact on firm performance, with audit committees, not boards, of most influence. But recent reforms implied most change to boards of directors. One suggestion is that non-market reform may have been unneeded given existing market pressure on listed firms and firms anticipating regulatory change. Social implications Kuwait's corporate governance reforms codified corporate governance practices already in place among many of its firms in pursuit of organisational legitimacy, and while invoking substantial change to audit committees, involved minor change to firm performance, at least in the short term. Some firms may also have delisted in expectation of stronger corporate governance requirements. Regardless, these direct and indirect processes both improved the overall quality of listed firm corporate governance and performance in Kuwait. Originality/value Seminal analysis of corporate governance reforms in Kuwait, which have rapidly progressed from no corporate governance code and guidelines to an initially voluntary and then compulsory regime. Only known analysis to incorporate both board of directors and audit committee characteristics. Reveals studies of the corporate governance–firm performance relationship may face difficulty in model specification, and empirical significance, given the complexity of corporate governance codes and guidelines, leads in changing firm behaviour and self-selection of firms into and out of regulated markets.

Chief executive officer compensation, corporate governance and performance: evidence from KSA firms

Executive compensation and corporate performance: Evidence from Jordanian commercial banks

Firm performance, corporate governance and executive compensation in Pakistan

Interactive effects of executive compensation, firm performance and corporate governance: Evidence from an Asian market

Equity incentives, earnings management and corporate governance: Empirical evidence using UK panel data

Executive compensation, risk and performance: evidence from the USA

Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility disclosure: evidence from an emerging market

IN LIGHT OF THE CURRENT ECONOMIC STATUS: DO BOARD CHARACTERISTICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES PROMOTE FIRM PERFORMANCE IN SAUDI ARABIA?

Do Publicly Listed Insurance Firms in Saudi Arabia Have Strong Corporate Governance?

Risk Management Practices and Performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia Companies

Ownership structure and firm performance: evidence from Saudi Arabia

Do corporate governance and top management team diversity have a financial impact among financial sector? A further analysis

The influence of corporate governance and shareholding structure on corporate social responsibility: The key role of executive compensation

Corporate Governance and Financial Performance in Saudi Arabian Listed Companies: A Integrative Literature Review

Empirical examination of the direct and moderating role of corporate social responsibility in top executive compensation

Corporate Governance Disclosure Attributes and Organisational Performance in Sub-Sahara Africa

Impact of board structure on firm performance: evidence from an emerging economy

Corporate governance in Kuwait: joining the dots between regulatory reform, organisational change in boards and audit committees and firm market and accounting performance

An analysis of corporate governance and company performance: a South African perspective

CEO compensation and firm performance in Japan: Evidence from new panel data on individual CEO pay

Executive compensation, firm performance, and Chaebols in Korea: Evidence from new panel data