Abstract:Since the discovery of co-receptor dependent alpha beta TCR recognition, considerable effort has been spent on elucidating the basis of CD4 and CD8 lineage commitment in the thymus. The latter is responsible for generating mature CD4 helper and CD8a13 cytotoxic T cell subsets. Although CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell recognition of peptide antigens is known to be MHC class II- and MHC class l-restricted, respectively, the mechanism of single positive (SP) thymocyte lineage commitment from bipotential double-positive (DP) progenitors is not fully elucidated. Classical models to explain thymic CD4 vs. CD8 fate determination have included a stochastic selection model or instructional models. The latter are based either on strength of signal or duration of signal impacting fate. More recently, differential co-receptor gene imprinting has been shown to be involved in expression of transcription factors impacting cytotoxicT cell development. Here, we address commitment from a structural perspective, focusing on the nature of co-receptor binding to MHC molecules. By surveying 58 MHC class II and 224 MHC class I crystal structures in the Protein Data Bank, it becomes clear that CD4 cannot bind to MHC I molecules, nor can CD8 alpha beta or CD8 alpha alpha bind to MHC II molecules. Given that the co-receptor delivers Lck to phosphorylate exposed CD3 ITAMs within a peptide/MHC (pMHC)-ligated TCR complex to initiate cell signaling, this strict co-receptor recognition fosters MHC class-restricted SP thymocyte lineage commitment at the DP stage even though both co-receptors are expressed on a single cell. In short, the binding preference of an alpha beta TCR for a peptide complexed with an MHC molecule dictates which co-receptor subsequently binds, thereby supporting development of that subset lineage. How function within the lineage is linked further to biopotential fate determination is discussed.

Inherent reactivity of unselected TCR repertoires to peptide-MHC molecules

T Cell Receptor Signaling Is Limited by Docking Geometry to Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex

Mechano-regulation of Peptide-MHC Class I Conformations Determines TCR Antigen Recognition.

T Cells and Their Eons-Old Obsession with MHC.

Novel MHC-Independent αβTCRs Specific for CD48, CD102, and CD155 Self-Proteins and Their Selection in the Thymus

Plasticity in the contribution of T cell receptor variable region residues to binding of peptide-HLA-A2 complexes

The partitioning of TCR repertoires by thymic selection

A molecular basis of human T cell receptor autoreactivity toward self-phospholipids

Stage-dependent Reactivity of Thymocytes to Self-Peptide–mhc Complexes

Peptide-MHC Binding Reveals Conserved Allosteric Sites in MHC Class I- and Class II-Restricted T Cell Receptors (TCRs).

Preselection TCR repertoire predicts CD4<SUP>+</SUP>and CD8<SUP>+</SUP>T-cell differentiation state

Structural Basis of Plasticity in T Cell Receptor Recognition of a Self Peptide-MHC Antigen

High Affinity Xenoreactive TCR:MHC Interaction Recruits CD8 in Absence of Binding to MHC1

On the elusive TCR specificity of thymic regulatory T cells

TCR Recognition of Peptide–MHC-I: Rule Makers and Breakers

Strict major histocompatibility complex molecule class-specific binding by co-receptors enforces MHC-restricted aß TCR recognition during T lineage subset commitment

Extraordinary cross-reactivity of an autoimmune T-cell receptor recognizing specific peptides both on autologous and on allogeneic HLA class II molecules

Class II major histocompatibility complex mutant mice to study the germ-line bias of T-cell antigen receptors

Emerging Concepts in TCR Specificity: Rationalizing and (Maybe) Predicting Outcomes

Canonical T cell receptor docking on peptide–MHC is essential for T cell signaling

The Influence of T Cell Development on Pathogen Specificity and Autoreactivity