Abstract:The rise of geostrategic rivalry between the United States and China is changing international cooperation. As China seeks new influence and the United States seeks to contain China and to reduce its own international obligations, three dimensions of multilateralism are becoming particularly important. The first is the management of the superpower rivalry, through formal treaties, informal arrangements among states, and international institutions. The second is the capacity of the leadership of any international institution to foster cooperation beyond the immediate preferences of one or another of the most powerful member states. The third dimension is the legitimacy on which the authority of international institutions rests. The evolution of these three elements will shape the future of multilateralism, by which I refer to the arrangements created and agreed by states which facilitate cooperation by enshrining commitments to diffuse reciprocity and peaceful dispute settlement. The analysis of history and of variations in current practice in international cooperation underscores several ways in which international cooperation could be sustained even as the US-China rivalry strengthens. Global agencies can play a crucial role finding and highlighting areas where cooperation and competition can coexist, and where their own capacities to pool information, to reduce transactions costs, and to broker and monitor agreements can assist. This, in turn, requires high-quality leadership by people who can effectively broker agreements among countries, persuade countries to pool resources, and attract and organize an effective and highly motivated staff. Such leadership requires positive ongoing action by member states, to define what is required for effective leadership of the institutions they collectively create, to seek proven competence in each domain before appointing leaders, and to monitor ongoing performance. Finally, international institutions can buttress their legitimacy by finding better ways to ensure the participation of all stakeholders, and to respond rapidly and effectively to global crises and to provide global public goods.

Multilateralism and East Asian transitions: the English School, diplomacy, and a networking regional order

Diverse Multilateralism: Four Strategies in China'S Multilateral Diplomacy

Multilateralism in the Twenty-First Century

Japan, South Korea and the rise of a networked security architecture in East Asia

China, the United States, and Order Transition in East Asia: an Economy-Security Nexus Approach

East Asia’s Evolving Regional Order and its Global Implications

Chinese-led Regional Multilateralism in Central and Eastern Europe, Africa and Latin America: 16 + 1, FOCAC, and CCF

NATO, APEC and ASEM: Triadic Interregionalism and Global Order

The New Thinking on China'S Asia Diplomacy During the Post-Cold War Era: Institutional Model Choices and Sino-Us Compatibility

Further development of Asian regionalism: institutional hedging in an uncertain era

China's Rise and the Evolution of the East Asia Regional Order

Debates on the Future of East Asian Security Cooperation

Institution Building under “10+3”: Tackling the Practical Issues

Institutional Change in International System and the Peaceful Transition in East Asia:An Institutional Perspective

A Political Economy Analysis on the Upsurge in Establishing Bilateral Free Trade Area:A perspective of New Regionalism

A Study of Security Cooperation Dilemmas and Pathways in Sino-Japanese Relations from A Constructivist Perspective

Analysis of the Major Characteristics of China's Multilateral Diplomacy in the Post-Cold War Era

China, the United States, and the East Asian Security Order

The Transformation of Asia-Pacific Regional Order in the Post Cold-War Era

Multilateralism, From Old to New:A Theoretical Study of the Transformation of International Institutions

China's Bilateral Relations, Order Transition, and the Indo-Pacific Dynamics