Prognostic and pathological impact of tumor budding in gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Yi-Xian Guo,Zi-Zhen Zhang,Gang Zhao,En-Hao Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v11.i10.898
2019-10-15
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Tumor budding, is a promising prognostic hallmark in many cancers, and can help us better assess the degree of malignancy in gastric cancer (GC) and in colorectal cancer. In the past few years, several articles on the relationship between tumor budding and GC have been published, but different results have been observed. As the relationship between tumor budding and GC remains controversial, we integrated the data from 7 eligible studies to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis.AIM: To systematically evaluate the prognostic and pathological impact of tumor budding in GC.METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Web of Science databases, and 7 cohort studies involving 2178 patients met our criteria and included in the analysis. The patients were divided into those with high-grade tumor budding and those with low-grade tumor budding, and the cut-off values for tumor budding varied across the included studies. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to estimate the impact of tumor budding on overall survival (OS) in GC patients. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95%CIs were used to determine the correlation between tumor budding and pathological parameters (tumor stage, tumor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis) of GC.RESULTS: Seven studies involving 2178 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The combined ORs suggested that high-grade tumor budding was significantly associated with tumor stage (OR = 6.63, 95%CI: 4.01-10.98, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), tumor differentiation (OR = 3.74, 95%CI: 2.68-5.22, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), lymphovascular invasion (OR = 7.85, 95%CI: 5.04-12.21, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01), and lymph node metastasis (OR = 5.75, 95%CI: 3.20-10.32, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). Moreover, high-grade tumor budding predicted a poor 5-year OS (HR = 1.79, 95%CI: 1.53-2.05, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01) in patients with GC and an adverse 5-year OS (HR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.45-2.42, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.01) in patients with intestinal-type GC.CONCLUSION: High-grade tumor budding suggested a poor prognosis in patients with GC or intestinal-type GC.
oncology,gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?