Assessment of simultaneous autotrophic–heterotrophic denitrification with high removal of nitrogen, sulfur and carbon: optimization through response surface methodology

Clio Peirano,Lorna Guerrero,Andrea Barahona,Silvio Montalvo,Cesar Huiliñir,Cristopher Da Silva,Rafael Borja
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6244
IF: 3.709
2019-11-29
Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology
Abstract:<h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> BACKGROUND</h3><p>Some liquid industrial wastes are rich in sulphur, nitrogen and organic matter, these lasts cause eutrophication of lakes and rivers. These wastes are also highly toxic to aquatic organisms and pose serious health problems. Biological nitrogen removal is performed by denitrification. The heterotrophic denitrifiers oxidize organic matter to CO<sub>2</sub> (g) and reduce nitrate to N<sub>2</sub> (g), while autotrophic denitrifiers oxidize the reduced sulphur compounds by reducing nitrate, so that a simultaneous denitrification process will allow for the removal of all these elements. </p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> RESULTS</h3><p>A response surface methodology (RSM) was used to analyze the effects of the heterotrophic/autotrophic bacteria (H/A: 0.2‐1.9), the molar Ac<sup>‐</sup>(Acetate)/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup> (0.2‐1.05) and S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2‐</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup> (0.15‐1.1) on the denitrification process. The highest concentrations of sulphate were obtained with H/A: 0.2; Ac<sup>‐</sup>/ NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup>: 1.05 and S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2‐</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup>: 0.91. </p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> CONCLUSION</h3><p>High NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup> (average 95.0±3.3%) removals were obtained in all experiments, the optimal values predicted by the RSM were obtained at H/A: 0.54, Ac<sup>‐</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup>: 1.05 and S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2‐</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup>: 0.41. When analyzing the removal of acetate, the recommended optimal operating values were: Ac<sup>‐</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup>: 1.05; H/A: 0.37 and S<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub><sup>2‐</sup>/NO<sub>3</sub><sup>‐</sup>: 0.8‐0.9. </p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
engineering, chemical,biotechnology & applied microbiology, environmental,chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?