Abstract:Assessing urban environmental sustainability is fundamentally important for guiding urban areas to achieve more sustainable urban development. We followed the theme-oriented framework to select eight indicators for measuring urban environmental sustainability performance in China using three aspects: waste emissions, resource consumption, and environmental initiatives. These eight indicators were measured per unit area, per capita, and per GDP for 286 prefecture-level cities, 22 urban clusters, and 7 geographic regions of China from 2000 to 2010. Among the 7 geographic regions, the East China region had the greatest intensity of waste emissions, resource consumption, and environmental investment per unit area. In comparison, the Central China region had greater water consumption and wastewater discharge measured per capita and per GDP. The North China region had greater waste gas emissions and energy consumption measured per capita and per GDP than the other regions. The three northern regions of China (North China, Northeast China, and Northwest China) also had the greatest solid waste emissions measured per capita and per GDP. The expansion of the built-up area per GDP was the greatest in the western regions (including Northwest China and Southwest China), indicating a very low urban land-use efficiency for these two regions. Among the 22 urban clusters, the 12 well-developed urban clusters had greater waste emissions, resource consumption, and environmental investment per unit area than the 10 less-developed urban clusters. The well-developed urban clusters also had larger environmental investment as a share of GDP than the less-developed urban clusters, but waste emissions and resource consumption per GDP were much lower for the well-developed urban clusters. Among the 286 prefecture-level cities, the cities with greater waste emissions and resource consumption per unit area also had greater environmental investment per unit area, but these cities increased their environmental investment at a relatively slower rate than the increase in their waste emissions and resource consumption. The cities that spent a larger share of GDP on pollution reduction had relatively lower waste emissions per GDP, but more investment should be targeted at improving resource efficiency, especially for those resource-intensive cities. In summary, the well-developed urban clusters and cities in the eastern region of China generally had much greater waste emissions and resource consumption per unit area (i.e., greater impacts), while they had lower waste emissions and resource consumption per capita and per GDP (i.e., higher efficiency) relative to the less-developed urban clusters and cities in central and western regions. Based on these findings, we proposed several countermeasures for improving urban environmental sustainability for different cities, urban clusters, and geographic regions of China.

Have cities effectively improved ecological well-being performance? Empirical analysis of 278 Chinese cities

Two-Stage Super-Efficiency Slacks-Based Model to Assess China's Ecological Wellbeing

Spatial and Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Urban Ecological Well-Being Performance in China

Using eco‐efficiency and eco‐wellbeing performance as indicators for urban sustainable development: A two‐stage network analysis

The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Trend Prediction of Ecological Wellbeing Performance in China

Assessing the Impact of Green Transformation on Ecological Well-Being Performance: A Case Study of 78 Cities in Western China

How is the environmental efficiency in the process of dramatic economic development in the Chinese cities?

Improving Urban Ecological Welfare Performance: An ST-LMDI Approach to the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Dynamic Evolution, Regional Differences, and Spatial Spillover Effects of Urban Ecological Welfare Performance in China from the Perspective of Ecological Value

Spatial distribution characteristics and variability of urban ecological welfare performance in the Yangtze River economic Belt: Evidence from 70 cities

Spatio-temporal pattern assessment of China's environmental performance and its spatial drivers: evidence from city-level data over 2003-2019

What Is the State of Development of Eco-Wellbeing Performance in China? An Analysis from a Three-Stage Network Perspective

Human Well-Being Related Analysis on Urban Carrying Capacity: an Empirical Study in Chinese Mega-Cities

Assessing Urban Sustainability of Chinese Megacities: 35 Years after the Economic Reform and Open-Door Policy

Spatial Differences of Ecological Well-Being Performance in the Poyang Lake Area at the Local Level

Measuring Urban Environmental Sustainability Performance in China: A Multi-Scale Comparison among Different Cities, Urban Clusters, and Geographic Regions

Eco-efficiency and effectiveness evaluation toward sustainable urban development in China: a super-efficiency SBM–DEA with undesirable outputs

The Spatial Differentiation and Driving Forces of Ecological Welfare Performance in the Yangtze River Economic Belt

Analysis of Ecological Efficiency, Ecological Innovation, Residents' Well-Being and Their Improvement Paths in Chinese Resource-Based Cities—Based on the Approaches of Two-Stage Super-SBM and fsQCA

Research on Environmental Performance Measurement and Influencing Factors of Key Cities in China Based on Super-Efficiency SBM-Tobit Model

Study on the development patterns of ecological civilization construction in China: An empirical analysis of 324 prefectural cities