Abstract:On the surface, the spirit of Olympic Games is about the competition for medals. Underneath the surface, however, lies a series of political, economical, social agendas. Individual Olympians represent their Nations. Rising modernity, stabilization of economy and social cohesion of nations are represented by the contemporary Architecture of the games. Every Olympic game has resulted in a significant change in the host city and presented the host country with a unique opportunity to shed a new light on itself in front of a global audience. In anticipation of presenting a brilliant, dynamic image to the world, Olympic cities often build contemporary sporting arenas that follow similar design patterns of generating iconic and autonomous buildings with relatively fixed programs. In order for a city to accommodate such a large number of newly constructed sporting venues, a trend has emerged whereby cities shift the games from the urban core to outlying peripheries, scattered throughout the suburbs. After the 17 days of international use, the venues return to serve the host city's needs. But the stadiums are largely freestanding objects that compete with pre-existing residential fields for the occupancy of local teams. These local teams often favor smaller arenas that are less maintenance-intensive and are more widely accessible due to their greater proximity to the city core. As a result, Olympic stadiums become underused, labeled as white elephants and even in some instances abandoned. The next Olympics will be held in Rio, which has the 5th largest economy in the world while also having one of the world's lowest GDP per capita. This thesis explores the possibility of exploiting the flamboyant nature of the Olympics to create a dual purpose field hockey stadium, the design of which is flexible enough to adapt to a post Olympics transformation into a vocational school.

Learning from temporary use and the making of on-demand communities in London’s Olympic “fringes”

Temporary urbanism as a new policy strategy: a contemporary panacea or a trojan horse?

Legacy and urban regeneration: long-term local impact of the London 2012 Olympic Games

Temporary temporariness? The (mis)use of tactical urbanism from the 'open city' framework

Olympic regeneration vs. social (in)justice: Value capture as a referee

Temporary Urbanism as a Catalyst for Social Resilience: Insights from an Urban Living Lab Practice-Based Research

Housing Movements, Commons and 'Precarious Institutionalization'

Towards a Political Economy of Social Infrastructure: Contesting “Anti‐Social Infrastructures” in London

Evaluating the impact of the 2012 Olympic Games policy on the regeneration of East London using spatio-temporal big data

Crossing Boundaries: Exploring the London Olympics 2012 as a Field-Configuring Event

Participatory governance for the temporary use of urban abandoned areas. A socio-spatial approach to the "Old Hospital" area in Alexandroupolis, Greece

Mega sport events and spatial management: zoning space across Rio’s 2016 Olympic city

Building a better host city? Reforming and contesting the Olympics in Paris 2024

Constructing legacy: walking audits of the leisure time physical activity potential of Tokyo Olympic venues and their urban milieu

Design for reuse : post occupancy of Olympicstadiums; Post occupancy of Olympic stadiums

The Hiding Hand controversy as an analytical approach in the study of urban megaevents

How do Olympic cities strategically leverage New Urban Tourism? Evidence from Tokyo

Finding common ground on the threshold: An experiment in critical urban learning

Opportunities and Challenges of Municipal Planning in Shaping Vertical Neighbourhoods in Greater London

Circularity on what grounds? Advancing learning for circular area development at the interface of proximity and precarity

In-Formality?: Two Cases of Temporary Uses in Urban Regeneration of South Korea