Abstract:With deceased and decayed bodies, personal identification is performed using hard tissue DNA, commonly extracted from bone. The quantity and quality of DNA used in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification step is critical for a successful outcome. Since enamel is the strongest tissue in the human body, it was hypothesized that teeth may preserve DNA better than bones. In the present study, porcine teeth and bone samples were exposed to a variety of environments that imitated personal identification conditions, and DNA extracted from the teeth and bone samples was compared, using a PCR amplification method. The porcine teeth and bones were exposed to 11 different conditions for 5 different time periods to imitate a series of common crime scenes. DNA was extracted by a standard phenol-chloroform method. To test DNA quality, PCR was performed with primers designed to amplify porcine β-actin (<i>ACTB</i>) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences. The results demonstrated that the quality of DNA extracted from teeth was greater than that extracted from bone in the following environments: Buried in sand, soaked in caustic soda and burnt with rubber. By contrast, the quality of DNA extracted from bone was greater than that extracted from teeth when samples were buried in soil or submerged in water. There was no discernable difference in the quality of DNA extracted from bones and teeth in several environments, including being submerged in seawater, soaked in sulfuric acid, left in open air, and stored at 4, -20 and -80°C. Additionally, the results suggested that PCR using mtDNA primers performed better than that using ACTB primers. Finally, it was indicated that components of seawater may inhibit PCR amplification. The preliminary data reported here may provide basic guidelines for selecting the optimum source of DNA in each case.

Comparison of two DNA extraction methods: PrepFiler® BTA and modified PCI-silica based for DNA analysis from bone

A novel, 4-h DNA extraction method for STR typing of casework bone samples

A comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from bone and tooth samples

Optimisation of an Automated DNA Extraction Method for Bone and Teeth Samples and Applicability to Two Forensic Cases

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for identification of human remains

Comparison of Three DNA Extraction Methods on Bone and Blood Stains up to 43 Years Old and Amplification of Three Different Gene Sequences

Evaluation of five DNA extraction systems for recovery of DNA from bone

Comparing two automated methods of DNA extraction from degraded skeletal remains

Evaluation of two DNA extraction methods on exhumed bone samples: Ultrafiltration versus column affinity

A comparative study between two protocols for DNA extraction from bones

A method for extracting DNA from hard tissues for use in forensic identification

High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization

A Simple and Efficient Method for Extracting DNA From Old and Burned Bone

Assessment of impact of DNA extraction methods on analysis of human remain samples on massively parallel sequencing success

Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods Developed for Forensic and Ancient DNA Applications Using Bone Samples of Different Age

Comparison of two silica-based extraction methods for DNA isolation from bones

A Suitable Method for DNA Extraction from Bones for Forensic Applications: A Case Study

Direct STR typing from human bones

DNA extraction of burnt bone and teeth casework samples using bead-beating homogenization technique

An alternative procedure for extraction of DNA from ancient and weathered bone fragments