Abstract:Objectives: a) To describe the introduction of noninvasive means to provide positive-pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure; b) to describe the physiologic response to noninvasive ventilation; c) to review the current published literature on using noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute hypercapnic and/or hypoxemic respiratory failure; d) to describe the technique of applying mask ventilation and current recommendations for using noninvasive ventilation and current recommendations for using noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure; and e) to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of noninvasive ventilation. Data sources: All relevant articles published in the English medical literature from 1988 through August 1994 were retrieved through a MEDLINE search, as well as from the author's experience. Study selection: Studies were selected based on the use of positive-pressure mechanical ventilation delivered, using facial or nasal masks in various acute settings of respiratory failure. Data extraction: The authors extracted all applicable data. Data synthesis: Studies were analyzed according to the type of respiratory failure (hypercapnic vs. hypoxemic) and underlying conditions where noninvasive ventilation seemed to be a better alternative. The results were evaluated based on types of masks used and modes of ventilation. Outcome measures were compared based on studies that randomized patients with acute respiratory failure to receive noninvasive vs. conventional therapy. Complications of noninvasive ventilation, mainly local, were compared with those complications seen endotracheal intubation in acute respiratory failure patients. Conclusions: Noninvasive ventilation is a safe and effective means of ventilatory support for many patients with acute respiratory failure. Noninvasive ventilation is well tolerated, principally because it allows the patient to be in control and to continue verbal communication, and should be strongly considered in managing terminally ill patients with potentially reversible causes of respiratory failure. The duration of mechanical ventilation and its associated complications are significantly decreased in hypercapnic respiratory failure with noninvasive ventilation.

Non‐invasive ventilation: A glimpse into the future

Long-term noninvasive ventilation in COPD: current evidence and future directions

[Non invasive ventilation: how, when and why?]

Beyond the guidelines for non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: implications for practice

Noninvasive ventilation in stable hypercapnic COPD: what is the evidence?

Update in Noninvasive Home Mechanical Ventilation: A Narrative Review of Indications, Outcomes, and Monitoring

Chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure and non-invasive ventilation in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

[Clinical research progress in non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in 2023]

Non-invasive ventilation in intensive care unit: yesterday, today, tomorrow (literature review)

Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to community-acquired pneumonia: A concise review and update

Non-invasive ventilation in the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders: A review and update

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory failure

Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

Pathophysiological Basis of Acute Respiratory Failure on Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Applying Noninvasive Ventilation in Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of COPD Using Evidence-Based Interprofessional Clinical Practice

[Clinical research progress in non-invasive positive pressure ventilation from 2020 to 2021]

Saving lives, one breath at a time: The key role of noninvasive ventilation interfaces

Open circuit mouthpiece ventilation: Concise clinical review

Noninvasive ventilation in children: A review for the pediatric anesthesiologist

Early non-invasive ventilation treatment for respiratory failure due to severe community-acquired pneumonia

Noninvasive ventilation usage time and survival rate in patients with acute respiratory failure: some key insights