Abstract:To improve conservation practice, decisions should be informed by the available evidence on the effectiveness of conservation actions. Here, we review the comprehensiveness of this evidence base for marine and freshwater mammals. We assess the taxonomic and geographic coverage of the evidence base, identify biases and suggest priorities for future research. Marine and freshwater mammals are increasingly threatened due to human activity. To improve conservation practice, decisions should be informed by the available evidence on the effectiveness of conservation actions. Using a systematically collated database of studies that test the effectiveness of actions to conserve marine and freshwater mammals, we investigated the gaps and biases in the available scientific evidence base. While there is a growing evidence base covering actions to address key threats (e.g. fisheries and bycatch) to marine and freshwater mammal populations, we identified large geographic and taxonomic biases. There was no relationship between the number of studies and marine mammal species per ecoregion and we found biases towards coastal areas of the Global North, with many regions and species having little or no evidence available. The number of studies per species did not correlate with (1) the threat level, (2) evolutionary distinctiveness or (3) the public 'popularity' of the study species. We also found a mismatch between actions tested and the actions suggested as needed in the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List. Several of these gaps and biases likely reflect the feasibility of researching marine mammal populations; many species can be difficult to access, with limited baseline information on populations and threats, and testing actions can require costly long‐term monitoring. Prioritizing the most cost‐effective conservation strategies for marine and freshwater mammal species will require a comprehensive evidence base on the effects of actions. Continuing to build the necessary baseline data, and focusing future research and funding towards the priority gaps identified in this study will be important to deliver this target.

Area requirements to safeguard Earth’s marine species

Gaps in Protection of Important Ocean Areas: A Spatial Meta-Analysis of Ten Global Mapping Initiatives

The Location and Protection Status of Earth’s Diminishing Marine Wilderness

Protecting the global ocean for biodiversity, food and climate

Ocean protection quality is lagging behind quantity: Applying a scientific framework to assess real marine protected area progress against the 30 by 30 target

Mapping the planet’s critical areas for biodiversity and nature’s contributions to people

Areas of global importance for conserving terrestrial biodiversity, carbon and water

Multinational coordination required for conservation of over 90% of marine species

Conservation priorities for global marine biodiversity across multiple dimensions

The MPA Guide: A framework to achieve global goals for the ocean

Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century

A Scientific Synthesis of Marine Protected Areas in the United States: Status and Recommendations

Status of Marine Biodiversity in the Anthropocene

Coral Reefs of the High Seas: Hidden Biodiversity Hotspots in Need of Protection

Prioritizing Land and Sea Conservation Investments to Protect Coral Reefs

Sustainable Development, Ocean Governance and Marine Protected Areas

Systematic Conservation Planning: A Better Recipe for Managing the High Seas for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use

A Global Map of Human Impact on Marine Ecosystems

Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss

Prioritizing future evidence needs for marine and freshwater mammal conservation action

Little progress in ecoregion representation in the last decade of terrestrial and marine protected area expansion leaves substantial tasks ahead