Abstract:Importance: In several pay-for-performance programs, Medicare ties payments to readmission rates but accounts only for a limited set of patient characteristics-and no measures of social risk-when assessing performance of health care providers (clinicians, practices, hospitals, or other organizations). Debate continues over whether accounting for social risk would mitigate inappropriate penalties or would establish lower standards of care for disadvantaged patients if they are served by lower-quality providers. Objectives: To assess changes in hospital performance on readmission rates after adjusting for additional clinical and social patient characteristics by using methods that distinguish the association between patient characteristics and readmission from between-hospital differences in quality. Design, setting, and participants: Using Medicare claims for admissions in 2013 through 2014 and linked US Census data, we assessed several clinical and social characteristics of patients that are not currently used for risk adjustment in the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. We compared hospital readmission rates with and without adjustment for these additional characteristics, using only the average within-hospital associations between patient characteristics and readmission as the basis for adjustment, thereby appropriately excluding hospitals' distinct contributions to readmission from the adjustment. Main outcomes and measures: All-cause readmission within 30 days of discharge. Results: The study sample consisted of 1 169 014 index admissions among 1 003 664 unique Medicare beneficiaries (41.5% men; mean [SD] age, 79.9 [8.3] years) in 2215 hospitals. Compared with adjustment for patient characteristics currently implemented by Medicare, adjustment for the additional characteristics reduced overall variation in hospital readmission rates by 9.6%, changed rates upward or downward by 0.37 to 0.72 percentage points for the 10% of hospitals most affected by the additional adjustments (±30.3% to ±58.9% of the hospital-level standard deviation), and would be expected to reduce penalties (in relative terms) by 52%, 46%, and 41% for hospitals with the largest 1%, 5%, and 10% of penalty reductions, respectively. The additional adjustments reduced the mean difference in readmission rates between hospitals in the top and bottom quintiles of high-risk patients by 0.53 percentage points (95% CI, 0.50-0.55; P < .001), or 54% of the difference estimated with CMS adjustments alone. Both clinical and social characteristics contributed to these reductions, and these reductions were considerably greater for conditions targeted by the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program. Adjustment for social characteristics resulted in greater changes in rates of readmission or death than in rates of readmission alone. Conclusions and relevance: Hospitals serving higher-risk patients may be penalized substantially because of the patients they serve rather than their quality of care. Adjusting solely for within-hospital associations may allow adjustment for additional patient characteristics to mitigate unintended consequences of pay for performance without holding hospitals to different standards because of the patients they serve.

The Sentinel Effect and Financial Reporting Aggressiveness in the Healthcare Industry

Measuring Returns to Hospital Care: Evidence from Ambulance Referral Patterns

An Exploratory Analysis of the Association between Hospital Quality Measures and Financial Performance

The company you keep: spreading effects of financial fraud on investor trust

EARNINGS MANAGEMENT IN U.S. HOSPITALS

Nonprofit accounting conservatism

Deterrence effects of antifraud and abuse enforcement in health care

CEO Equity Incentives and Financial Misreporting: The Role of Auditor Expertise

Hospital financial position and the adoption of electronic health records

Patient experience with hospital care following the Maryland global budget revenue model: A difference-in-difference analysis

Public Reporting and Consumer Demand in the Home Health Sector

Financial reporting practices: a comprehensive evaluation

The inefficient effects of non-clinical factors on health care costs

Impact of External Environmental Dimensions on Financial Performance of Major Teaching Hospitals in the U.S.

Government reporting credibility as immunity: Evidence from a public health event

Association of Insurance Type with Inpatient Surgical 30-day Readmissions, Emergency Department Visits/Observation Stays, and Costs

Determinants of the complementary level of financial and tax aggressiveness: a cross-country study

Assessment of Environmental Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting by Large Health Care Organizations

Assessment of the Effect of Adjustment for Patient Characteristics on Hospital Readmission Rates: Implications for Pay for Performance

CAN AUDITOR INDUSTRY EXPERTISE REDUCE INCIDENCES OF MISREPORTING?

Transparency versus Performance in Financial Markets: The Role of CSR Communications