The ‘perfect’ counsellor: personality factors and multidimensional perfectionism

Chelsey L. Holden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2019.1682122
2019-10-21
British Journal of Guidance and Counselling
Abstract:Personality factors and multidimensional perfectionism have not been researched among professional counsellors. This study examined the relationship between the Big Five (John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., &amp; Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, &amp; L. A. Pervin (Eds.), <i>Handbook of personality: Theory and research</i> (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press) personality factors with Hewitt and Flett's (1991. Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. <i>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</i>, 60, 456–470) three dimensions of perfectionism among counsellors (<i>N</i> = 257) using a canonical correlation. All canonical functions were statistically significant, explaining 43.8% of the total variance within the data. Correlations across variable sets indicate a significant correlation between neuroticism and socially prescribed perfection (<i>r</i> = .430; <i>p</i> &lt; .001), neuroticism and self-oriented perfection (<i>r</i> = .297; <i>p</i> &lt; .001), extraversion and socially prescribed perfection (<i>r </i>= −.231; <i>p</i> = .002), conscientiousness and socially prescribed perfection (<i>r</i> = −.180; <i>p</i> = .015), and agreeableness and others-oriented perfection (<i>r</i> = −.175; <i>p</i> = .018).
psychology, applied
What problem does this paper attempt to address?