Real-world Decision-making Process for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Minimally Invasive Surgery in Early-stage Lung Cancer Patients
Stijn Vanstraelen,Kay See Tan,Prasad S Adusumilli,Manjit S Bains,Matthew J Bott,Robert J Downey,Daniel R Gomez,Katherine D Gray,James Huang,James M Isbell,Daniela Molena,Bernard J Park,Andreas Rimner,Valerie W Rusch,Narek Shaverdian,Smita Sihag,Abraham J Wu,David R Jones,Gaetano Rocco
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006552
2024-10-01
Abstract:Objective: To generate a prediction model for selection of treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Summary background data: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are used in the local treatment of early-stage NSCLC. However, selection of patients for either SBRT or MIS remains challenging, due to the multitude of factors influencing the decision-making process. Methods: We analyzed 1291 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC treated with intended MIS or SBRT from January 2020 to July 2023. A prediction model for selection for SBRT was created based on multivariable logistic regression analysis. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis stratified the cohort into 3 treatment-related risk categories. Post-procedural outcomes, recurrence and overall survival (OS) were investigated to assess the performance of the model. Results: In total, 1116 patients underwent MIS and 175 SBRT. The prediction model included age, performance status, previous pulmonary resection, MSK-Frailty score, FEV1 and DLCO, and demonstrated an area-under-the-curve of 0.908 (95%CI, 0.876-0.938). Based on the probability scores (n=1197), patients were stratified into a low-risk (MIS, n=970 and SBRT, n=28), intermediate-risk (MIS, n=96 and SBRT, n=53) and high-risk category (MIS, n=10 and SBRT, n=40). Treatment modality was not associated with OS (HR of SBRT, 1.67 [95%CI: 0.80-3.48]; P=0.20). Conclusion: Clinical expertise can be translated into a robust predictive model, guiding the selection of stage I NSCLC patients for MIS versus SBRT and effectively categorizing them into three distinct risk groups. Patients in the intermediate category could benefit most from multidisciplinary evaluation.