Making the Eurozone Sustainable by Financial Engineering or Political Union?

Paul De Grauwe,Yuemei Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12918

2019-09-01

Abstract:2.1 Tranching Government DebtThe idea behind the proposal to force governments to issue junior debt if their expenditures exceed some threshold value is that this will subject governments to more market discipline. The reasoning is the following. When governments spend too much they are forced to finance the extra spending by issuing junior bonds. As a result, the buyers of these bonds will face more risk and demand a risk premium. Thus, these governments will pay a higher interest rate which will enforce more discipline. The market will do its job of reining in the tendency of governments to spend too much.All this sounds plausible. The evidence of past financial cycles of booms and busts, however, is that this disciplining mechanism typically fails. During booms, euphoria prevails and few investors perceive risks. As mentioned earlier, during the Eurozone boom years, investor saw no difference in risks between Greek and German sovereign bonds. It is likely that when euphoria prevails they will see no significant difference in risks between the different tranches of outstanding government bonds.During the downturn, exactly the opposite will happen. In fact, the existence of junior bonds will work as wake‐up call and set in motion panic reactions of flight. As a result, governments, which have issued junior bonds, are more likely to be hit by a self‐fulfilling liquidity crisis forcing them into excessive discipline and austerity.The reality is that financial markets are not well‐equipped to enforce discipline on sovereigns. The introduction of some new financial instrument will not change that reality.

economics,international relations,political science