Abstract:Using two different algorithms and five predictor sets, we created distribution models for two example succulent species and produced an updated map of global inter‐annual rainfall predictability. High model performance metrics suggest that the majority of potentially suitable regions for these species are predicted by these models with a limited number of climate predictors, and there is no benefit in expanding model complexity and increasing the potential for overfitting. Identifying the environmental drivers of the global distribution of succulent plants using the Crassulacean acid metabolism pathway of photosynthesis has previously been investigated through ensemble‐modeling of species delimiting the realized niche of the natural succulent biome. An alternative approach, which may provide further insight into the fundamental niche of succulent plants in the absence of dispersal limitation, is to model the distribution of selected species that are globally widespread and have become naturalized far beyond their native habitats. This could be of interest, for example, in defining areas that may be suitable for cultivation of alternative crops resilient to future climate change. We therefore explored the performance of climate‐only species distribution models (SDMs) in predicting the drivers and distribution of two widespread CAM plants, Opuntia ficus‐indica and Euphorbia tirucalli. Using two different algorithms and five predictor sets, we created distribution models for these exemplar species and produced an updated map of global inter‐annual rainfall predictability. No single predictor set produced markedly more accurate models, with the basic bioclim‐only predictor set marginally out‐performing combinations with additional predictors. Minimum temperature of the coldest month was the single most important variable in determining spatial distribution, but additional predictors such as precipitation and inter‐annual precipitation variability were also important in explaining the differences in spatial predictions between SDMs. When compared against previous projections, an a posteriori approach correctly does not predict distributions in areas of ecophysiological tolerance yet known absence (e.g., due to biotic competition). An updated map of inter‐annual rainfall predictability has successfully identified regions known to be depauperate in succulent plants. High model performance metrics suggest that the majority of potentially suitable regions for these species are predicted by these models with a limited number of climate predictors, and there is no benefit in expanding model complexity and increasing the potential for overfitting.

Evaluating the ecological realism of plant species distribution models with ecological indicator values

Ecological and biological indicators of the accuracy of species distribution models: lessons from European bryophytes

Assessing the reliability of species distribution projections in climate change research

Evaluation metrics and validation of presence-only species distribution models based on distributional maps with varying coverage

Plant ecological indicator values as predictors of fine‐root trait variations

Ecological indicator values reveal missing predictors of species distributions

Beyond a diagnostic tool: Validating standardized Mahalanobis distance as a species distribution model for invasive alien species in North America

How sensitive are species distribution models to different background point selection strategies? A test with species at various equilibrium levels

How decisions about fitting species distribution models affect conservation outcomes

Dealing with area‐to‐point spatial misalignment in species distribution models

Calibrating ecological indicator values and niche width for a Mediterranean flora

Evaluating species distribution model predictions through time against paleozoological records

The potential for species distribution models to distinguish source populations from sinks

Testing projected wild bee distributions in agricultural habitats: predictive power depends on species traits and habitat type

Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices

A comparison in species distribution model performance of succulents using key species and subsets of environmental predictors

Reviewing the Strength of Evidence of Biodiversity Indicators for Forest Ecosystems in Europe

Species distribution modelling for plant communities: stacked single species or multivariate modelling approaches?

The interplay of various sources of noise on reliability of species distribution models hinges on ecological specialisation

Measuring and comparing the accuracy of species distribution models with presence–absence data

One to rule them all? Assessing the performance of sustainable forest management indicators against multitaxonomic data for biodiversity conservation