Abstract:Bioretention systems have become a leading infiltration-based Low Impact Development (LID) practice to reduce urban stormwater runoff volumes and peak flows. Although these systems have performed well in many site-scale field studies, modeling of bioretention systems has received less attention. Additional studies are needed which calibrate various models to field measurements to investigate and optimize the performance of individual LID practices and effectively scale local interventions to the watershed. DRAINMOD-Urban has been successfully applied to bioretention at the site-scale due to its advanced soil–water accounting using the soil–water characteristic curve and its ability to explicitly model underdrains and internal water storage (IWS) zones. At the same time, the U.S. EPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) has become one of the most widely used urban drainage models. The latest version, SWMM5, included dedicated LID modules including a routine for bioretention modeling.In this study, DRAINMOD-Urban and the SWMM LID module were compared through detailed analysis of the internal processes of each model as well as through model calibration and output investigation. The objective was to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each model and compare the performance of both models to a single bioretention cell. Both SWMM and DRAINMOD-Urban were evaluated in calibrated and uncalibrated scenarios since urban drainage models often remain uncalibrated for planning scenario analysis. Following calibration, DRAINMOD-Urban was superior for replicating drainage hydrographs (NSE = 0.60) while SWMM produced better overflow hydrographs (NSE = 0.57). Specifically, SWMM often output a maximum drainage rate that caused rectangular drainage hydrographs, but DRAINMOD-Urban was better able to match the shape of measured drainage hydrographs. While the DRAINMOD-Urban model output was in good agreement with measured drainage and overflow event volumes when calibrated (drainage NSE = 0.83, overflow NSE = 0.57–0.66), SWMM was closer to measured volumes even when uncalibrated (drainage NSE = 0.70–0.93, overflow NSE = 0.59–0.81). This study improved existing knowledge of the SWMM LID module by calibrating to field-collected data from a single bioretention cell for the first time in literature. Furthermore, the results of this study indicate an opportunity for model coupling that could combine the strengths and weaknesses of each model and improve bioretention cell modeling.

Development of the DNDC model to improve soil hydrology and incorporate mechanistic tile drainage: A comparative analysis with RZWQM2

An Easily Implemented Agro-Hydrological Procedure with Dynamic Root Simulation for Water Transfer in the Crop–soil System: Validation and Application

Extending the Integrated Richards Equation Method to New Boundary Conditions: Model Description and Validation

Simulation of Dynamic Root Growth and Water Transfer in Soil-Crop-atmosphere System

Comparison of RZWQM2 and DNDC Model in Simulating Greenhouse Gas Emission, Crop Yield and Subsurface Drainage

Evaluating RZ-SHAW Model for Simulating Surface Runoff and Subsurface Tile Drainage under Regular and Controlled Drainage with Subirrigation in Southern Ontario

GDNDC: An integrated system to model water-nitrogen-crop processes for agricultural management at regional scales

Comparison of simulated nitrogen management strategies using DRAINMOD-DSSAT and RZWQM2

Comparison of RZWQM2 and DNDC Models to Simulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions under Combined Inorganic/Organic Fertilization in a Subsurface-Drained Field

Simulating nitrate-nitrogen concentration from a subsurface drainage system in response to nitrogen application rates using RZWQM2

Simulating Hydrologic Cycle and Crop Production in a Subsurface Drained and Sub-Irrigated Field in Southern Quebec Using RZWQM2

Improving nitrate load simulation of the SWAT model in an extensively tile-drained watershed

Assessment of Macropore Component of RZWQM2 in Simulating Hourly Subsurface Drainage and Peaks

Assessing SWAT+ Performance in Simulating Drainage Water Management and Parameter Transferability for Watershed-Scale Applications

MODIFICATIONS TO THE DSSAT VERTICAL DRAINAGE MODEL FOR MORE ACCURATE SOIL WATER DYNAMICS ESTIMATION

Field application of DRAINMOD model to the simulation of water table,surface runoff and subsurface drainage

Using RZWQM2‐P to capture tile drainage phosphorus dynamics in Ohio

Improving model capability in simulating spatiotemporal variations and flow contributions of nitrate export in tile-drained catchments

Enabling a process-oriented hydro-biogeochemical model to simulate soil erosion and nutrient losses

Modeling the Effects of Artificial Drainage on Agriculture‐Dominated Watersheds Using a Fully Distributed Integrated Hydrology Model

Modeling bioretention hydrology: Quantifying the performance of DRAINMOD-Urban and the SWMM LID module