Abstract:Part-of-speech (POS) tagging is an indispensable method of text processing. The main aim is to assign part-of-speech to words after considering their actual contextual syntactic-cum-semantic roles in a piece of text where they occur (Siemund & Claridge 1997). This is a useful strategy in language processing, language technology, machine learning, machine translation, and computational linguistics as it generates a kind of output that enables a system to work with natural language texts with greater accuracy and success. Part-of-speech tagging is also known as ‘grammatical annotation’ and ‘word category disambiguation’ in some area of linguistics where analysis of form and function of words are important avenues for better comprehension and application of texts. Since the primary task of POS tagging involves a process of assigning a tag to each word, manually or automatically, in a piece of natural language text, it has to pay adequate attention to the contexts where words are used. This is a tough challenge for a system as it normally fails to know how word carries specific linguistic information in a text and what kind of larger syntactic frames it requires for its operation. The present paper takes up this issue into consideration and tries to critically explore how some of the well-known POS tagging systems are capable of handling this kind of challenge and if these POS tagging systems are at all successful in assigning appropriate POS tags to words without accessing information from extratextual domains. The novelty of the paper lies in its attempt for looking into some of the POS tagging schemes proposed so far to see if the systems are actually successful in dealing with the complexities involved in tagging words in texts. It also checks if the performance of these systems is better than manual POS tagging and verifies if information and insights gathered from such enterprises are at all useful for enhancing our understanding about identity and function of words used in texts. All these are addressed in this paper with reference to some of the POS taggers available to us. Moreover, the paper tries to see how a POS tagged text is useful in various applications thereby creating a sense of awareness about multifunctionality of tagged texts among language users.

Semantic Tag Categories in Corpus Linguistics: Experience and Examination

Semantic Relatedness in Folksonomy

Tags Are Related: Measurement of Semantic Relatedness Based on Folksonomy Network

A Semantic Relatedness Service Based on Folksonomy

Semantic Tagging on Historical Maps

Towards Universal Semantic Tagging

Universal Semantic Tagging for English and Mandarin Chinese.

Semantic Imitation in Social Tagging.

Looking into the Operational Modalities Adopted in Some of the POS Tagging Tools in Identification of Contextual Part-of-Speech of Words in Texts

Modeling Ontology of Folksonomy with Latent Semantics of Tags

Metaphor, Popular Science, and Semantic Tagging: Distant reading with the Historical Thesaurus of English

A Modality Lexicon and its use in Automatic Tagging

Semantic role tagging for chinese at the lexical level

Capturing Paradigmatic and Syntagmatic Lexical Relations: Towards Accurate Chinese Part-of-Speech Tagging.

Integrating Supertag Features into Neural Discontinuous Constituent Parsing

Semantic Hypergraphs

The semantic content of concrete, abstract, specific, and generic concepts

Categories of Semantic Concepts

The Semantic Mapping of Words and Co-Words in Contexts

Learning from syntax generalizations for automatic semantic annotation

Tag Clouds for Displaying Semantics: The Case of Filmscripts