Clinical relevance of bilateral pleural effusion in patients with acute pulmonary embolism

Ofer Levy,Daniel Fux,Tetiana Bartsikhovsky,Sergei Vosko,Moshe Tishler,Laurian Copel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14671
2020-08-01
Internal Medicine Journal
Abstract:<h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>The clinical relevance of bilateral pleural effusion (BPE) in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is unclear.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Aims</h3><p>To describe characteristics of patients with acute PE that present with BPE.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Patients with acute PE were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three groups: without pleural effusion, unilateral pleural effusion, and bilateral effusion. Clinical, laboratory and radiological characteristics were compared between the three groups.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The study population (n=343) consisted of unilateral effusion group (n=83), BPE group (n=94) and without effusion group (n=166). Several variables were noted in higher proportion (%), in the BPE group in comparison to both the unilateral effusion and without effusion groups; Heart failure (17.0vs7.2vs6.7, p=0.017), Hypoalbuminemia (59.3vs39.5 vs25.6, p˂0.001), PE occurrence in‐hospital setting (51vs25.6vs15.1, p˂0.001), major operation (31vs19.2vs15.2, p=0.01), and mechanical ventilation (13.0vs4.9vs4.2, p=0.019). Norton scale scores were found to be lower among patients with BPE in comparison to both patients with unilateral and without pleural effusion (15.55vs16.92vs17.36, p=0.006). After adjusting confounding variables, patients with BPE have lower probability for in‐hospital survival in comparison to both patients with unilateral pleural effusion (OR=0.30, 95% CI [0.12,0.79]), and patients without pleural effusion (OR=0.26, 95% CI [0.11,0.61]).</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>BPE in patients with acute PE may have significant clinical implications. It may signify serious underlying comorbidities which contribute to higher in‐hospital mortality in comparison to both patients with unilateral pleural effusion and patients without pleural effusion.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p>
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?