A global analysis of the impact of zero‐tillage on soil physical condition, organic carbon content, and plant root response

Surajit Mondal,Debashis Chakraborty,Kalikinkar Bandyopadhyay,Pramila Aggarwal,Dharamvir Singh Rana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3470
2020-01-05
Land Degradation and Development
Abstract:<p>Food security involves the sustainable utilization of soil and land resources. No‐tillage (NT) practice is a proponent of better resource utilization, to improve soil physical condition, and a potential sink to atmospheric carbon. However, the impact varies across climates, over the NT history, cropping systems and soil depths. A meta‐analysis was performed, based on 4131 paired data from 522 studies spread globally, to evaluate the effect of NT in comparison to conventional tillage (CT), on soil physical condition (bulk density, BD; mean weight diameter of aggregates, MWD; field capacity water content, FC; and steady‐state infiltration rate, IR), soil organic carbon (SOC) content, and the root response (root length density, RLD). No‐tillage significantly improved MWD and FC at surface and sub‐surface layers by 19‐58% and 6‐16% respectively, and resulted in no change in BD in either of the layers, but IR increased by 66%. Surface 0‐5 and 5‐10 cm layers had significantly higher SOC content under NT, while in other layers, the SOC content either reduced or did not change, resulting in a small and insignificant variation in the SOC stock (~1.1%) in favour of NT. The RLD improved by ~35% in NT only at 0‐ to 5‐cm soil depth. Effect of climate, soil type or cropping system could not be broadly recognized, but the impact of NT certainly increased over time. Improvements in soil aggregation and hydraulic properties are highly convincing with the adoption of NT, and therefore this practice leads to the better and sustainable use of soil resources.</p>
soil science,environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?