Abstract:INTRODUCTION. Based on the study of the international law, doctrine and practice of states, the article analyzes the content of the institution of the historical rights of the state to the sea areas, its correlation with the provisions of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, as well as the legal status of the Sea of Okhotsk and the possibility of its adjustment in in the context of a possible statement by Russia that it has historical rights to its water area. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The issues raised in the article are structurally divided into three main groups. The first one is related to the study of the reasons for the emergence of the institution of historical rights of states to maritime areas in the international law of the sea, as well as its correlation with the legal mechanisms for the delimitation and use of maritime spaces defined by the 1982 UN Convention. The second is devoted to studying the structure of this institution and definition of the concept and content within its framework of such key notions and categories as “historical bays”, “historical waters”, “historical legal foundations”, “historical title of the state” and some others. The third group is directly connected with the definition of the fundamental possibility and potential scope of the extension of the Russian Federation historical rights to the waters of the Sea of Okhotsk. RESEARCH RESULTS. When writing the work, the authors proceeded from the fact that despite the limited potential of Russia's possible actions to defend its historical title to the Sea of Okhotsk, they can not be considered unpromising in the foreseeable historical perspective. At the same time it should be borne in mind that the way to achieve success in solving this problem should not lie in declaring its water area an inland sea or historical waters of Russia, but in legitimizing by our state a number of its exclusive historical rights in this maritime area based on Russia's vital interests. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS. The content of the institution of the historical rights of states to maritime spaces, as well as the new political reality, give the Government and the State Duma of the Russian Federation all the necessary grounds for raising the question of a partial change in Russia's position on the legal status of the Sea of Okhotsk and the development of a new strategy for upholding Russia's historical rights to its water area, as through the adoption of unilateral internal legal acts, and through the implementation of a consistent policy to disseminate and uphold this point of view in international relations within the framework of negotiations with foreign states and the activities of relevant international bodies and organizations.

In the Same Boat? A Comparative Analysis of the Approaches of Russia and Canada in the Negotiation of the IMO’s Mandatory Polar Code

Regulation of Arctic Shipping in Canada and Russia

Between the Polar Code and Article 234: The Balance in Canada’s Arctic Shipping Safety and Pollution Prevention Regulations

Between Economic Nationalism and Globalism: Evaluating Russia’s Recent Regulations on Arctic Shipping

Arctic Policy Developments and Marine Transportation

Canada and the Russian Federation: Maritime Boundaries and Jurisdiction in the Arctic Ocean

The imo Polar Code: The Emerging Rules of Arctic Shipping Governance

The Arctic Council, the International Maritime Organization, and the Polar Code

Polar Code implementation in the Arctic Five: has harmonisation of national legislation recommended by AMSA been achieved?

The Polar Code and the Arctic Marine Environment: Assessing the Regulation of the Environmental Risks of Shipping

Introduction to the New Maritime Arctic

The IMO Mandatory International Code of Safety for Ships: Charting a Sustainable Course for Shipping in the Polar Regions?

Maritime Shipping in the Arctic: Challenges and Opportunities to Improve Safety Must Be Reflected in the State’s Transport Policy

The Polar Code's Implications for Safe Ship Operations in the Arctic Region

Maritime Transport in the Arctic After the Introduction of the Polar Code: A Discussion of the New Training Needs

The impact of the Polar Code on risk mitigation in Arctic waters: a “toolbox” for underwriters?

Indigenous Rights and Interests in a Changing Arctic Ocean: Canadian and Russian Experiences and Challenges

“Green shipping” and the problem of sustainable use of maritime transport

Polar Code application areas in the Arctic

From melting ice to green shipping: navigating emission reduction challenges in Arctic shipping in the context of climate change

Historical Rights of States to Maritime Water Areas and the Legal Status of the Sea of Okhotsk