Abstract:Thanks to the widespread availability of large-scale datasets on scholarly outputs, science itself has come under the microscope with the aim of capturing a quantitative understanding of its workings. In this study, we leverage well-established cognitive models coming from anthropology in order to characterise the personal network of collaborations between scientists, i.e., the network considered from the standpoint of each individual researcher (referred to as ego network), in terms of the cognitive investment they devote to the different collaborations. Building upon these models, we study the interplay between the structure of academic collaborations, academic performance, and academic mobility at different career stages. We take into account both purely academic mobility (i.e., the number of affiliation changes) and geographical mobility (i.e., physical relocations to different countries). For our investigation, we rely on a dataset comprising the geo-referenced publications of a group of 81,500 authors extracted from Scopus, one of the biggest repositories of academic knowledge. Our main finding is that there is a clear correlation between the structure of co-authorship ego networks and academic performance indices: the more one publishes and the higher their impact, the larger their collaboration network. However, we observe a capacity bound effect, whereby, beyond a certain point, higher performances become increasingly less correlated with large collaboration networks. We also find that international academic migrants are better at growing their networks than researchers that only migrate within the same country, but the latter seem to be better in exploiting their collaboration to achieve higher impact. High academic mobility does not appear to translate into better academic performance or larger collaboration networks.

International Research Collaborations as Perceived by Top-Performing Scholars

Exploring Academics' Beliefs about Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration and Their Influences on Collaborative Practices: a Mixed-Method Study in China

The collaboration behavior of top scientists

Are researchers that collaborate more at the international level top performers? An investigation on the Italian university system

The relationship between scientists' research performance and the degree of internationalization of their research

The academic wanderer: structure of collaboration network and relation with research performance

Variation in research collaboration patterns across academic ranks

A Network Perspective on Success in Collaboration: Stop Citing Me for Our Own Good?

Good and Bad Research Collaborations: Researchers' Views on Science and Ethics in Global Health Research

Methods for assessing higher education research team collaboration: comparing research outputs and participant perceptions across four collaborative research teams

Toward scientific collaboration: A cost-benefit perspective

International Research Collaboration: Novelty, Conventionality, and Atypicality in Knowledge Recombination

An empirical analysis of individual and collective determinants of international research collaboration

Macro-level Collaboration Network Analysis and Visualization with Essential Science Indicators: A Case of Social Science

The Agency-Structure Complex in International Research Collaboration: Evidence from a Chinese Elite University

Persistent Hierarchy in Contemporary International Collaboration

The Continuing Growth of Global Cooperation Networks in Research: A Conundrum for National Governments

Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science

Impactful scientists have higher tendency to involve collaborators in new topics

INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES

Impact of Scientific, Economic, Geopolitical, and Cultural Factors on International Research Collaboration