Accessing surgical care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Patient variation in travel distance and choice to bypass hospitals to reach higher volume centers

Adrian Diaz,Sarah Burns,Anghela Z. Paredes,Timothy M. Pawlik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25750

2019-11-07

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>While better outcomes at high‐volume surgical centers have driven regionalization of complex surgical care, access to high‐volume centers often requires travel over longer distances. We sought to evaluate travel patterns of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer to assess willingness of patients to travel for surgical care.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>The California Office of Statewide Health Planning database was used to identify patients who underwent PD between 2005 and 2016. Total distance traveled, as well as whether a patient bypassed the nearest hospital that performed PD to get to a higher‐volume center was assessed. Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with bypassing a local hospital for a higher‐volume center.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Among 23 014 patients who underwent PD, individuals traveled a median distance of 18.0 miles to get to a hospital that performed PD. The overwhelming majority (84%) of patients bypassed the nearest providing hospital and traveled a median additional 16.6 miles to their destination hospital. Among patients who bypassed the nearest hospital, 13,269 (68.6%) did so for a high‐volume destination hospital. Specifically, average annual PD volume at the nearest "bypassed" vs final destination hospital was 29.6 vs 56 cases, respectively. Outcomes at bypassed vs destination hospitals varied (incidence of complications: 39.2% vs 32.4%; failure‐to‐rescue: 14.5% vs 9.1%). PD at a high‐volume center was associated with lower mortality (OR = 0.46 95% CI, 0.22‐0.95). High‐volume PD ( > 20 cases) was predictive of hospital bypass (OR = 3.8 95% CI, 3.3‐4.4). Among patients who had surgery at a low‐volume center, nearly 20% bypassed a high‐volume hospital in route. Furthermore, among patients who did not bypass a high‐volume hospital, one‐third would have needed to travel only an additional 30 miles or less to reach the nearest high‐volume hospital.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Most patients undergoing PD bypassed the nearest providing hospital to seek care at a higher‐volume hospital. While these data reflect increased regionalization of complex surgical care, nearly 1 in 5 patients still underwent PD at a low‐volume center.</p></section>

oncology,surgery

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to explore the travel patterns of patients with pancreatic cancer who undergo pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) when choosing a surgical hospital, especially to evaluate whether patients are willing to travel long distances for surgical care and whether there are patients who will bypass the nearest hospital to go to a higher - volume surgical center for surgery. The research background points out that although high - volume surgical centers can provide better treatment results, patients often need to travel long distances to reach these centers. Therefore, this study evaluates patients' willingness to travel long distances to obtain high - quality surgical care by analyzing the travel distances and hospital - choosing behaviors of patients who underwent PD surgery in California between 2005 and 2016. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following issues: 1. **Are patients willing to travel long distances to obtain pancreatoduodenectomy?** Researchers hope to understand whether patients are willing to choose long - distance travel for the quality of surgery by analyzing patients' travel distances. 2. **Will patients bypass the nearest hospital?** Researchers also explore whether patients will choose to bypass the nearest hospital that can perform PD surgery and go to a hospital with a higher surgical volume for surgery. 3. **Factors influencing patients' hospital selection**: Researchers use multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with patients' choice to bypass the nearest hospital and go to a higher - volume center, such as race, insurance type, etc. Through the exploration of these issues, the study aims to provide a basis for improving the regionalized management of complex surgical operations, especially in terms of balancing the distribution of medical resources and patient convenience.

Accessing surgical care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Patient variation in travel distance and choice to bypass hospitals to reach higher volume centers

Travel burden and bypassing closest site for surgical cancer treatment for urban and rural oncology patients

Centralization of Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Redefining at-risk patients undergoiong pancreaticoduodenectomy: Impact of socioeconomic factors including Area Deprivation Index and distance traveled

Drivers of Cost for Pancreatic Surgery: It’s Not About Hospital Volume

Multivariable Analysis of Factors Associated with Hospital Readmission Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Malignant Diseases

Association between volume and cost in low‐resection volume regions: a population‐level study on pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer patients

Center-level variation in hospitalization costs of pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer

Hospital Surgical Volume Is Poorly Correlated With Delivery of Multimodal Treatment for Localized Pancreatic Cancer

Evolution Of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections For Pancreatic And Periampullary Diseases: Perioperative Outcomes Of 605 Patients At A High-Volume Center

Distance to Treatment With Radical Cystectomy in a Rural State: Long Car Rides, Equivalent Outcomes

Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes in a Low-Volume, Specialised Hepato Pancreato Biliary Unit

Variation in outcomes across surgeons meeting the Leapfrog volume standard for complex oncologic surgery

Hospital and Surgeon Selection for Medicare Beneficiaries With Stage II/III Rectal Cancer: The Role of Rurality, Distance to Care, and Colonoscopy Provider

Rescue from complications after pancreaticoduodenectomies at a low-volume Caribbean center: Value of tailored peri-pancreatectomy protocols

Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Separate Propensity Score Matching Analyses of Distal Pancreatectomy and Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Patients get more long-term benefit from central pancreatectomy than distal resection: A meta-analysis

Traveling Long Distances for Rectal Cancer Care: Institutional Outcomes and Patient Experiences

Patterns of care and outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic cancer based on rurality of patient's residence in a rural midwestern state

Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States

Surgical Outcome After Distal Pancreatectomy With and Without Portomesenteric Venous Resection in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Transatlantic Evaluation of Patients in North America, Germany, Sweden, and The Netherlands (GAPASURG)