Algorithmic identification of persons with dementia for research recruitment: ethical considerations
Alex John LondonJason KarlawishEmily A. LargentSpencer Phillips HeyEllen P. McCarthya Center for Ethics and Policy,Carnegie Mellon University,Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USAb Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,USAc Department of Medicine,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,USAd Department of Neurology,University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania,USAe Prism Analytic Technologies,Cambridge,Massachusetts,USAf Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research,Hebrew SeniorLife,Boston,Massachusetts,USAg Division of Gerontology,Department of Medicine,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Harvard Medical School,Boston,Massachusetts,USA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2023.2299881
IF: 3.082
2024-01-11
Informatics for Health and Social Care
Abstract:Underdiagnosis, misdiagnosis, and patterns of social inequality that translate into unequal access to health systems all pose barriers to identifying and recruiting diverse and representative populations into research on Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias. In response, some have turned to algorithms to identify patients living with dementia using information that is associated with this condition but that is not as specific as a diagnosis. This paper explains six ethical issues associated with the use of such algorithms including the generation of new, sensitive, identifiable medical information for research purposes without participant consent, issues of justice and equity, risk, and ethical communication. It concludes with a discussion of strategies for addressing these issues and prompting valuable research.
health care sciences & services,medical informatics