Abstract:Diagnostic bone marrow (BM) DNA and matched plasma-derived circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) demonstrated excellent correlations in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML),1-4 and dynamic ctDNA monitoring contributes to predict relapse in MDS and AML patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).5 However, few researches are reported on the application of ctDNA dynamic monitoring assessments during the whole disease course in MDS and AML.1 Here, we assessed the feasibility and utility of ctDNA as a novel and minimally invasive biomarker based on targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to monitor treatment outcome, track clonal evolution and predict survival. To the best of our knowledge, we firstly demonstrated the application of ctDNA concentration as an effective prognostic biomarker in MDS and AML. The details of clinical data and methods are shown in Tables S1–S3. Thirty-five adult patients were involved in our study. Twenty-seven patients had pre- and post-treatment plasma-derived ctDNA, and paired baseline BM DNA NGS assessments were included for both concordance analysis and dynamic ctDNA analysis. Four patients with only baseline BM DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA NGS assessments were used for concordance analysis. Three patients with only pre- and post-treatment ctDNA assessments and one patient with only post-treatment ctDNA assessments were used for dynamic ctDNA analysis (Figure 1). A total of 46 mutated genes with 135 mutations were detected in BM DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA, involving 42 genes with 100 mutations (74.1%) detected both in BM DNA and plasma-derived ctDNA (Figure 2A, Figure S1). Among the 100 concordant mutations, the concordance of variant allele frequencies (VAFs) assessment based on plasma and BM was high (R = .854 p < .001) (Figure 2B). Comparing pre-treatment mean ctDNA concentrations with blasts in BM at baseline measured by cytological analysis, we found pre-treatment mean ctDNA concentrations were strongly associated with BM blasts at baseline (R = .618, p < .001) (Figure 2C), indicating mean ctDNA concentration were related to tumour burden. We also reached a moderate correlation between pre-treatment mean ctDNA VAF and BM blasts (R = .533, p = .001) (Figure S2). For patients with pre- and post-treatment paired samples, dynamic change of VAFs was analyzed. Patients were segregated into three groups, including those achieved a complete response (CR), those with CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) (for AML), morphologic CR (mCR) (for MDS)/morphologic leukaemia-free state (mLFS) (for AML) or stable disease (SD) (for MDS) and those with progressive disease (PD). Sixteen patients with CR had dramatically decreased VAFs (median VAF, 16.7% pre-treatment vs. 0% post-treatment, p < .001). Persistent VAFs were observed in CRi, mCR, mLFS and SD patients (median VAF, 3.6% pre-treatment vs. 3.3% post-treatment, p = .804). VAFs from PD patients tended to increase (median VAF, 4.7% pre-treatment vs. 6.7% post-treatment, p = .053) (Figure 2D). The post-treatment VAFs were lower in patients with CR versus those without CR (median VAF, 0% vs. 3.7%, p < .001) (Figure S3A). Similarly, delta VAFs from pre-treatment to post-treatment were greater in patients with CR versus those without CR (median delta VAF, 12.8% vs. −.3%, p < .001) (Figure S3B). As expected, post-treatment ctDNA positivity was associated with both shorter progression-free survival (PFS, median PFS, 5.6 vs. not reached [NR] months, p < .001) (Figure 3A) and overall survival (OS, median OS, 11.0 vs. NR months, p < .001) (Figure 3B). In the meantime, increased mean ctDNA VAF (defined as increasing post-treatment compared with pre-treatment ctDNA VAF) predicted decreased PFS (median PFS, 2.8 vs. 25.0 months, p < .001) (Figure 3C) and OS (median OS, 8.1 vs. 16.8 months, p = .014) (Figure 3D). Furthermore, we discovered patients with increased mean ctDNA concentration have poorer PFS (median PFS, 2.8 vs. NR months, p < .001) (Figure 3E) and OS (median OS, 7.9 vs. NR months, p < .001) (Figure 3F). However, the significant prognostic impact of pre-treatment ctDNA status on PFS and OS with mean ctDNA VAF (Figure S4A,B) or mean ctDNA concentration (Figure S4C and D) was not discovered, indicating pre-treatment ctDNA status was not a good biomarker to stratify the prognosis. To investigate the prognostic differences between mean ctDNA VAF and mean ctDNA concentration change from post- to pre-treatment, we compared the discrimination ability of the prognostic model with the concordance index (C-index). The model based on mean ctDNA concentration change showed better discrimination of PFS with C-index value of .79, compared to mean ctDNA VAF with C-index value of .75. The area under curve (AUC) for predicting 1-year PFS indicated more excellent conformity based on ctDNA concentration change, compared to mean ctDNA VAF (AUC, .84 vs. .82) (Figure 3G). Similarity was also discovered in OS analysis (C-index, .70 vs. .67; AUC, .78 vs. .72) (Figure 3H). Next, we tried to explore clonal evolution patterns in refractory or relapsed MDS and AML. We observed two patterns of progression from MDS to secondary AML (sAML). Patient 1 (P1) showed a linear pattern, where successive clones occurred within the previous parental clone. The acquisition of FLT3 mutation occurred during disease relapse and subsequently transformation to AML (Figure 4A). P7 and P8 showed a branched pattern (Figure 4B, Figure S5A, respectively). For P7, the original clone harboring PTPN11 mutation was suppressed while a new clone carrying FLT3-ITD mutation expanded, leading to AML transformation. However, we only discovered one linear pattern in refractory or relapsed AML. Three representative patients (P11, P26 and P35) achieved CR and relapsed within 6−7 months (Figure 4C, Figure S5B,C, respectively). The founding clone in the primary tumour in P11 contained mutations in WT1, GATA2 and RAD21 that were all recurrent at relapse. A new subclone occurred and evolved to become the dominant clone at relapse by acquiring additional SETD2 mutations. Compared with flow cytometry measurable residue disease results, we found that ctDNA molecular residue detection was earlier about 4 months. In summary, our study revealed that serial plasma-derived ctDNA assessments can reflect treatment response, survival, and clonal evolution in adult MDS and AML as a minimally invasive method, which warrant the prospective use of ctDNA as a biomarker in disease monitoring. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 81800121) and Zhejiang Medical Association Clinical Research Fund project (grant number: 2017ZYC-A14). The authors also thank all the patients who participated in this study. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant Number: 81800121; Zhejiang Medical Association Clinical Research Fund project, Grant Number: 2017ZYC-A14. The data used in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Abstract:Background: Measurable residual disease (MRD) by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) is highly prognostic for relapse and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, many pts with apparent "MRD negativity" by MFC still relapse. These relapses are likely due to residual leukemia that is present below the level of detection of MFC (generally ~1x10-4). In light of the limitations of conventional MRD assays, we sought to evaluate the clinical impact of a highly sensitive next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based MRD assay that is capable of detecting residual leukemia at a level of 1x10-6. Methods: We performed a retrospective study of 67 pts with previously untreated Philadelphia chromosome-negative ALL who received frontline therapy between 2/2012 and 7/2018 with a hyper-CVAD-based regimen (n=44) or a lower-intensity hyper-CVD-based regimen (n=23), which was usually combined with inotuzumab ozogamicin, and achieved complete remission (CR). Pts were selected for this study based on availability of banked samples at baseline and at sequential remission time points up to 4.5 months after start of therapy. Six-color MFC was performed as standard of care with an analytic sensitivity of 0.01% (1x10-4). Pretreatment genomic DNA derived from bone marrow was evaluated using a quantitative NGS MRD assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies Co., Seattle, WA) to identify dominant rearrangements within the B-cell receptor (IgH [VDJ and DJ], IgK and IgL). High throughput NGS of remission samples was subsequently performed to assess the target clonal rearrangements at an established analytic sensitivity of 0.0001% (1x10-6). Results: The baseline characteristics of the study population are shown in Table 1. Twenty pts (30%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) in first remission. In the entire cohort, 14 pts relapsed (21%), including 2 with CNS-only relapses. The median duration of follow-up for the entire cohort was 51 months. Among the 109 remission samples, 84 were MRD-negative (MRDneg), 24 were MRD-positive (MRDpos), and 1 was indeterminate by MFC (Figure 1). All 24 MRDpos samples by MFC were also MRDpos by NGS. Among the 84 MRDneg samples by MFC, 32 (38%) were MRDpos by NGS. For these discordant cases, the median level of MRD by NGS was below the expected level of detection by MFC (median 0.002% [range 0.00002%-1.15%]). At the time of CR, 44/67 pts (66%), achieved MRDneg by MFC and 14/38 (37%) achieved MRDneg by NGS. The rates of MRDneg by MFC in pts treated with hyper-CVAD or hyper-CVD regimens were 61% and 74%, respectively, and by NGS were 32% and 46%, respectively. Achieving MRDneg by NGS at the time of CR better predicted the likelihood of durable remission than did achieving MRDneg by MFC. The 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) of the 44 pts who achieved MRDneg by MFC and of 14 pts who achieved MRDneg by NGS was 27% and 8%, respectively. Only 1 out of 14 pts who achieved MRDneg by NGS at the time of CR subsequently relapsed. In contrast, MRD status by NGS did not predict for relapse when evaluated at post-CR time points. Among pts treated with a more intensive hyper-CVAD regimen, achievement of MRDneg by NGS at CR provided additional prognostic information compared to MRD status by MFC at the same time point and identified pts with an excellent long-term outcome. The 5-year OS rate for pts who achieved MRDneg by NGS at CR was 100% vs. 55% for those who were MRDpos by NGS (Figure 2A; P<0.05). This superior outcome was driven by the lower CIR rate in the MRDneg pts (Figure 2B; 5-year CIR: 13% vs. 58% in MRDpos pts). The impact of achieving MRDneg by NGS at CR was particularly evident in pts who did not undergo alloSCT in first remission where the 5-year CIR rates were 14% and 81%, respectively. When integrating MRD information by MFC and NGS, the 5-year OS rate for pts who were MRDneg by both MFC and NGS, MRDneg by MFC but MRDpos by NGS, and MRDpos by both MFC and NGS were 100%, 67%, and 38%, respectively (P=0.02 for trend). Similarly, the 5-year CIR rates were 13%, 57%, and 63%, respectively. Conclusion: Early assessment of MRD using an ultrasensitive NGS assay can identify pts with ALL who have a very low risk of relapse and excellent long-term survival. Prospective studies are warranted to assess whether de-intensification of therapy is feasible for this favorable-risk group of pts who rapidly achieve MRDneg remission. Disclosures Short: Amgen: Honoraria; Astellas: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kantarjian:Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cyclacel: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunogen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding. Konopleva:F. Hoffmann La-Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ablynx: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Forty-Seven: Consultancy, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceutical Inc.;: Patents & Royalties: patents and royalties with patent US 7,795,305 B2 on CDDO-compounds and combination therapies, licensed to Reata Pharmaceutical; Kisoji: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding. Jain:Cellectis: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; BeiGene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Precision Bioscienes: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kebriaei:Kite: Other: Served on advisory board; Amgen: Other: Research Support; Ziopharm: Other: Research Support; Pfizer: Other: Served on advisory board; Novartis: Other: Served on advisory board; Jazz: Consultancy. Yilmaz:Pfizer: Research Funding; Daicho Sankyo: Research Funding; Pint Pharma: Honoraria. Issa:Celegene: Research Funding; Syndax: Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ravandi:BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Xencor: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Orsenix: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jabbour:Amgen: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; BMS: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; AbbVie: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Takeda: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding; Pfizer: Other: Advisory role, Research Funding.

Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring By Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia: MRD Positivity after First Consolidation Chemotherapy Can Better Predict Clinical Outcomes Than That after Induction Chemotherapy

Serial Monitoring of Circulating Tumour DNA on Clinical Outcome in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukaemia.

Clinical implications of sequential MRD monitoring by NGS at 2 time points after chemotherapy in patients with AML

A Novel and Cost-Efficient Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) Detection Assay Using a Single Molecule Molecular Inversion Probe-Based Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Assay Predicts Overall Survival in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Myelodysplasia-Related Gene Mutations for NGS-Based MRD Assessment in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

PS1027 ASSESSMENT OF MOLECULAR MRD KINETICS BY ERROR‐CORRECTED NEXT‐GENERATION SEQUENCING PROVIDES INDEPENDENT PROGNOSTIC INFORMATION IN ADULT AML PATIENTS

Clinical significance of next‐generation sequencing technology for monitoring molecular minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia

Predictive Value of Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Minimal Residual Disease after CAR-T Cell Therapy

Performance of Next Generation Sequencing for Minimal Residual Disease Detection for Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results from the Prospective Clinical Trial DFCI 16-001

Ultrasensitive Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Measurable Residual Disease Assessment in Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia after Frontline Therapy: Correlation with Flow Cytometry and Impact on Clinical Outcomes

Moffitt Cancer Center 2-Year Single-Institution Experience with Next-Generation Sequencing Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Clinical Utility, Application, and Correlation with Outcomes in Plasma Cell and Lymphoid Malignancies

NGS-defined measurable residual disease (MRD) after initial chemotherapy as a prognostic biomarker for acute myeloid leukemia

Pre-MEASURE: Multicenter evaluation of the prognostic significance of measurable residual disease testing prior to allogeneic transplantation for adult patients with AML in first remission.

Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Testing in Newly Diagnosed Multiple myeloma (MM) Patients: A Prospective Head-to-Head Assessment of Cell-Based, Molecular, and Molecular-Imaging Modalities

High-sensitivity next-generation sequencing MRD assessment in ALL identifies patients at very low risk of relapse

P383: the next-generation sequencing (ngs) based mrd assessment could better predict relapse than multiparameter flow cytometry (mfc) in adult b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Minimal Residual Disease Detection in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia By Next Generation Sequencing: Impact on Clinical Outcomes

Detection Of Measurable Residual Disease May Better Predict The Outcome Rather Than Mutations Based On Next Generation Sequencing In Acute Myeloid Leukemia With Biallelic Mutations Of Cebpa

MRD assessment using NGS in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Meta-analysis.

Molecular Detection of Minimal Residual Disease Provides the Most Powerful Independent Prognostic Factor Irrespective of Clonal Architecture in Nucleophosmin (NPM1) Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Prognostic Effect and Clinical Application of Early Measurable Residual Disease (MRD) By Flow Cytometry on De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)