IDentification of patients in need of general and specialised PALLiative care (ID-PALL©): item generation and content validity of a new interprofessional screening instrument.

Fabienne Teike Lüthi,Mathieu Bernard,Michel Beauverd,Claudia Gamondi,Anne-Sylvie Ramelet,Gian Domenico Borasio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17375/v1

2019-11-15

Abstract:Abstract Background Early identification of patients requiring palliative care is a major public health concern. A growing number of instruments exist to help professionals in identifying these patients, but thus far, none have been thoroughly assessed for criterion validity. In addition, no currently available instruments differentiate between patients in need of general vs. specialized palliative care, and most are primarily intended for physicians’ use. This study aims to develop a new interprofessional instrument allowing identification of patients in need of general vs specialized palliative care.Methods The instrument development consisted of four steps: i) literature review to determine the concept to measure; ii) generation of a set of items; iii) review of the initial set of items by experts to establish the content validity; iv) administration of the items to a sample of the target population to establish face validity. We conducted a Delphi process with experts in palliative care to accomplish step 3 and sent a questionnaire to nurses and physicians non-specialised in palliative care to achieve step 4. A committee of interdisciplinary clinical experts supervised all steps.Results The study was conducted in the French - and Italian-speaking regions of Switzerland. The literature review confirmed the necessity of distinguishing between general and specialised palliative care needs and of adapting clinical recommendations to these different needs. Thirty-six nurses and physicians participated in the Delphi process and 28 were involved in the face validity assessment. The Delphi process resulted in two item lists: a 7-items list to identify patients in need of general PC and an 8-items list for specialised PC needs. The content and face validity were deemed to be acceptable by both the expert and the target populations.Conclusion This instrument considers a new perspective in the identification of patients requiring palliative care as it has been designed to differentiate between general and specialised palliative care needs. Moreover, diagnostic data is not fundamental to the use of the instrument, thus facilitating its use by healthcare professionals other than physicians, in particular nurses. Internal and criterion validity assessments are ongoing and essential before further dissemination of the instrument.