Abstract:Context: Complying with privacy regulations has taken on new importance with the introduction of the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and other privacy regulations. Privacy measures are becoming a paramount requirement demanding software organizations’ attention as recent privacy breaches such as the Capital One data breach affected millions of customers. Software organizations, however, struggle with achieving privacy compliance. In particular, there is a lack of research into the organizational practices and challenges involved in compliance, particularly for small and medium enterprises (SMEs), which represent a sizeable portion of organizations. Many SMEs use a continuous software engineering (CSE) approach, which introduces additional adoption and application challenges. For example, the fast pace of CSE makes it harder for SMEs that are already more resource constrained to prioritize non-functional requirements such as privacy. Objective: This paper aims to fill a gap in the under-researched area of continuous compliance with privacy requirements in practice, by investigating how a continuous practicing SME dealt with GDPR compliance. Method: Using design science, we conducted an in-depth ethnographically informed study over the span of 16 months and iteratively developed two artifacts to help address the organization’s challenges in addressing GDPR compliance. Results: We identified 3 main challenges that our collaborating organization experienced when trying to comply with the GDPR. To help mitigate the challenges, we developed two design science artifacts, which include a list of privacy requirements that operationalized the GDPR principles for automated verification, and an automated testing tool that helps to verify these privacy requirements. We validated these artifacts through close collaboration with our partner organization and applying our artifacts to the partner organization’s system. Conclusions: We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and obstacles in leveraging CSE to achieve continuous compliance with the GDPR. We also highlight the importance of building a shared understanding of privacy non-functional requirements and how risk management plays an important role in an organization’s GDPR compliance.

Design principles for the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A formal concept analysis and its evaluation

Model Driven Engineering for Data Protection and Privacy: Application and Experience with GDPR

GDPR Compliance in the Context of Continuous Integration

The European Union general data protection regulation: what it is and what it means

The Seven Sins of Personal-Data Processing Systems under GDPR

GDPR Anti-Patterns: How Design and Operation of Modern Cloud-scale Systems Conflict with GDPR

Data Protection by Design Tool for Automated GDPR Compliance Verification Based on Semantically Modeled Informed Consent

Understanding the notion of risk in the General Data Protection Regulation

Transforming Data Flow Diagrams for Privacy Compliance (Long Version)

Design Challenges for GDPR RegTech

EU General Data Protection Regulation: A Gentle Introduction

Analyzing GDPR Compliance Through the Lens of Privacy Policy

Data-CASE: Grounding Data Regulations for Compliant Data Processing Systems

Are we there yet? Understanding the challenges faced in complying with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Modeling the System Described by the EU General Data Protection Regulation with DEMO

Purpose definition as a crucial step for determining the legal basis under the GDPR: implications for scientific research

Towards privacy compliance: A design science study in a small organization

Legal Requirements Analysis

Modelling Technique for GDPR-compliance: Toward a Comprehensive Solution

Towards a GDPR-compliant cloud architecture with data privacy controlled through sticky policies

Trends in Interpretation of EU Data Protection Authorities of Cybersecurity Requirements Under the GDPR