Causality and Hume’s foundational project

Miren Boehm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781138323032-9
2018-10-26
Abstract:The last few decades have witnessed intense debates in Hume scholarship concerning Hume’s account of causation. At the core of the “old–new Hume” debate is the question of whether causation for Hume is more than mere regularity, in particular, whether Hume countenances necessary connections in mind-independent nature. This chapter assesses this debate against the background of Hume’s “foundational project” in the Treatise. The question of the role and import of Hume’s account of the idea of cause is examined and compared with Hume’s treatment of other ideas. David Hume introduces his “foundational project” in his first philosophical work, the Treatise, and it is in this text that he articulates the project most fully and carries it out most deliberately. Against the background of Hume’s foundational project, New Humeans are right that Hume’s examination of ideas is not meant to provide metaphysical accounts of the nature of reality. The traditional reading takes Hume’s account of our idea of cause to yield the metaphysical conclusion that all that causation amounts to in a mind-independent world is constant conjunction or mere regularity. The step or inference from Hume’s account of the idea of ‘cause’ to the metaphysical, regularity theory is supported by a certain theory of meaning. The idea of causation is not just fundamental to all science and philosophy; it also plays an essential role within Hume’s own system.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?