Abstract:Background Increasing muscle strength may allow an athlete to improve their performance while reducing the risk of injury. Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) has emerged as an alternative for increasing muscle strengh because it can promote physiological changes and hypertrophy with a lower degree of mechanical overload. When combined with Neuromuscular Electrostimulation (NME) it offers the possibility of hypertrophy with greater activation of motor units, potentially increasing the effects of BFR. Objectives To evaluate the effects of strength training with BFR combined with NME of the quadriceps muscle in physically active individuals on parameters of strength and muscle activation. Methods This protocol is a randomized clinical trial with a blinded evaluator for groups and statistical analysis. Eligibility criteria will be age between 18 and 35 years old; both sexes and physically active according to the International Physical Activity Questionnaire. The following criteria are not considered appropriate: Body Mass Index over 30; use of stimulants in the 24 hours before the examinations; risk factors for thromboembolism and hypertension. Anthropometric data will be collected, followed by blood pressure measurement and kirtometers. Subjects will be randomly divided into three groups: Blood Flow Restriction Group (BFRG), Blood Flow Restriction and Electrostimulation Group (BFREG) and Conventional Exercise Group (CEG). A Vascular Doppler will be used to measure Total Occlusion Pressure (TOP). Maximum Repetition Test (1RM) unilateral will be used to determine the load during exercise, with adjustment in four weeks. An isokinetic dynamometer in concentric/eccentric mode at two angular speeds will be uses to assess muscle strenght: 60º/s and 180º/s, and isometric strength by the 30s test at 30º and 60º. Surface Electromyography (EMG) will be used to record the electrical activity of the quadriceps muscles. The intervention protocol consists of four sets of 30, 15, 15, 15 repetitions in the chair for extension, with one minute rest between sets, a load of 30% 1RM and 50% of POT, with adjustment of 5% each week up 80% of POT. The BFREG follows the same methodology, with an asymmetric biphasic current, frequency of 50Hz and a pulse duration of 400us. In the CEG the exercise will be performed without intervention in three sets of ten repetitions at 70% of 1RM. The training lasts eight weeks and takes place twice a week, with re-evaluation at the end of the training. The distribution of normality will be analysed by the Shapiro-Wilk test. To analyse the effect of group and the interventions, ANOVA for repeated measures and Bonferroni post test will be performed. The significant level adopted will be 5%. Conclusion It is reasonable to assume that BFR and the intervention associated with electrostimulation are superior to conventional training in terms of strength and muscle recruitment parameters. Implications Because BFR requires a reduced load and it has been hypothesised that its effects are similar to those of conventional training, BRF offers mechanical and physiological benefits. Reduced loading may produce the same results in terms of hypertrophy and increased muscle strength in individuals without joint overload and prolonged loading.

The effects of strength training session with different types of muscle action on white blood cells counting and Th1/Th2 response

Strength Training Session Induces Important Changes on Physiological, Immunological, and Inflammatory Biomarkers

Physiological responses of three strength training methods in trained individuals

Effects of aerobic and strength-based training on metabolic health indicators in older adults

A single session of strength training changed plasma levels of resistin, but not leptin in overweight and obese men

EFFECTS OF STRENGTH TRAINING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION AND ELECTROSTIMULATION ON MUSCLE STRENGTH AND ACTIVITY – STUDY PROTOCOL

Effect of Strength Training on Lipid and Inflammatory Outcomes: Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Resistance Training Improves the Immune Response, Mainly Associated with CD8 + T Lymphocytes and B Lymphocytes, in Mice

Salivary proteomic profile of response to different resistance training protocols: A case report

Effects of Different Resistance Training Frequencies on Body Composition, Muscular Strength, Muscle Quality, and Metabolic Biomarkers in Sarcopenic Older Women

Effect of resistance, endurance, and concurrent training on TNF-α, IL-6, and CRP

Effects of Training Volume in the Bench-Press Exercise Performed With Interrepetition Rest Periods on Strength Gains and Neuromuscular Adaptations

Resistance training-induced changes in muscle proteolysis and extracellular matrix remodeling biomarkers in the untrained and trained states

Effects of Resistance Training Overload Progression Protocols on Strength and Muscle Mass

Acute Effects of the New Method Sarcoplasma Stimulating Training Versus Traditional Resistance Training on Total Training Volume, Lactate and Muscle Thickness

Monitoring strength training: neuromuscular and hormonal profile

Effect of aerobic training with blood flow restriction on strength and hypertrophy: a meta-analysis

Strength training improves body composition, muscle strength and increases CD4+ T lymphocyte levels in people living with HIV/AIDS

Resistance Training is Medicine: Effects of Strength Training on Health

Effect of Whole-Body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Training on Inflammatory and Anti-inflammatory Cytokines in Overweight Men

Effects of imposed and self-selected exercise on perceptual and affective responses, muscle function, quality, and functionality of strength training in older women and men: a randomized trial