Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting

Erik Leijte,Ivo de Blaauw,Frans Van Workum,Camiel Rosman,Sanne Botden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2
2019-11-21
Surgical Endoscopy
Abstract:Abstract Background Compared to conventional laparoscopy, robot assisted surgery is expected to have most potential in difficult areas and demanding technical skills like minimally invasive suturing. This study was performed to identify the differences in the learning curves of laparoscopic versus robot assisted suturing. Method Novice participants performed three suturing tasks on the EoSim laparoscopic augmented reality simulator or the RobotiX robot assisted virtual reality simulator. Each participant performed an intracorporeal suturing task, a tilted plane needle transfer task and an anastomosis needle transfer task. To complete the learning curve, all tasks were repeated up to twenty repetitions or until a time plateau was reached. Clinically relevant and comparable parameters regarding time, movements and safety were recorded. Intracorporeal suturing time and cumulative sum analysis was used to compare the learning curves and phases. Results Seventeen participants completed the learning curve laparoscopically and 30 robot assisted. Median first knot suturing time was 611 s (s) for laparoscopic versus 251 s for robot assisted ( p < 0.001), and this was 324 s versus 165 (sixth knot, p < 0.001) and 257 s and 149 s (eleventh knot, p < 0.001) respectively on base of the found learning phases. The percentage of ‘adequate surgical knots’ was higher in the laparoscopic than in the robot assisted group. First knot: 71% versus 60%, sixth knot: 100% versus 83%, and eleventh knot: 100% versus 73%. When assessing the ‘instrument out of view’ parameter, the robot assisted group scored a median of 0% after repetition four. In the laparoscopic group, the instrument out of view increased from 3.1 to 3.9% (left) and from 3.0 to 4.1% (right) between the first and eleventh knot ( p > 0.05). Conclusion The learning curve of minimally invasive suturing shows a shorter task time curve using robotic assistance compared to the laparoscopic curve. However, laparoscopic outcomes show good end results with rapid outcome improvement.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: to compare the differences in the learning curves of suturing techniques between robot - assisted surgery and traditional laparoscopic surgery in a simulated environment. Specifically, the study aims to evaluate whether there are significant differences in the learning curves of the two surgical methods in minimally invasive suturing tasks, especially in terms of task completion time, operational safety and accuracy. ### Research Background With the development and application of surgical innovative technologies, surgeons are required to master new technical skills, which poses an unprecedented challenge to them. The learning curve refers to the amount of process training that surgeons need to achieve proficiency in a new procedure. For complex minimally invasive suturing tasks, robot - assisted surgery is considered to have greater potential than traditional laparoscopic surgery, especially in difficult areas and situations with high technical requirements. ### Research Objectives The main objectives of this study are: 1. **Evaluate the learning curve**: Compare the learning curves of robot - assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery in a simulated environment, especially the differences in task completion time. 2. **Analyze task performance**: Evaluate the performance of the two surgical methods in complex suturing tasks through multiple evaluation parameters (such as time, movement, safety, etc.). 3. **Explore the influence of experience**: Analyze the influence of laparoscopic experience on the surgical learning curve. ### Main Findings - **Initial stage**: The robot - assisted group showed a shorter task completion time at the beginning of the task, while the laparoscopic group showed a faster learning speed. - **Characteristics of the learning curve**: The robot - assisted group maintained a relatively stable trend of time reduction throughout the learning process, while the laparoscopic group showed a steeper learning curve in the early stage, but could also achieve good results in the end. - **Influence of experience**: Participants with laparoscopic experience showed a faster initial stage on the learning curve of robot - assisted surgery, but there were still differences in some parameters (such as "proper knot - tying"). ### Conclusions The study shows that robot - assisted surgery shows shorter initial task completion time and more intuitive operation ability in complex minimally invasive suturing tasks. However, laparoscopic surgery shows faster progress in the early learning stage and can also achieve good results in the end. This indicates that the two surgical methods each have their own advantages, and the specific choice should be weighed according to the actual situation and requirements. Through these findings, the study provides surgeons with important information about the learning curves of robot - assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery, which is helpful for optimizing training programs and improving surgical skills.