Crystal structures and calorimetry reveal catalytically relevant binding mode of coproporphyrin and coproheme in coproporphyrin ferrochelatase

Stefan Hofbauer,Johannes Helm,Christian Obinger,Kristina Djinović‐Carugo,Paul G. Furtmüller
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15164
2019-12-19
Abstract:<p>Coproporphyrin ferrochelatases (CpfCs, EC 4.99.1.9) insert ferrous iron into coproporphyrin III yielding coproheme. CpfCs are utilized by prokaryotic, mainly monoderm (Gram‐positive) bacteria within the recently detected coproporphyrin‐dependent heme biosynthesis pathway. Here we present a comprehensive study on CpfC from <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> (<i>Lm</i>CpfC) including the first crystal structure of a coproheme‐bound CpfC. Comparison of crystal structures of apo‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC and coproheme‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC allowed identification of structural rearrangements and of amino acids involved in tetrapyrrole macrocycle and Fe<sup>2+</sup> binding. Differential scanning calorimetry of apo‐, coproporphyrin III‐ and coproheme‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC underline the pronounced non‐covalent interaction of both coproporphyrin and coproheme with the protein (Δ<i>T</i><sub>m</sub> = 11 °C compared to apo‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC) which includes the propionates (p2, p4, p6, p7) and the amino acids Arg29, Arg45, Tyr46, Ser53 and Tyr124. Furthermore, the thermodynamics and kinetics of coproporphyrin III and coproheme binding to apo‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC is presented as well as the kinetics of insertion of ferrous iron into coproporphyrin III‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC that immediately leads to formation of ferric coproheme‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC (<i>k</i><sub>cat</sub>/<i>K</i><sub>M</sub> = 4.7 × 10<sup>5</sup> M<sup>‐1</sup> s<sup>‐1</sup>). We compare the crystal structure of coproheme‐<i>Lm</i>CpfC with available structures of CpfCs with artificial tetrapyrrole macrocycles and discuss our data on substrate binding, iron insertion and substrate release in the context of the coproporphyrin‐dependent heme biosynthesis pathway.</p>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?