Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to analyze and compare attitudes and perceptions of Muslim leadership toward society and politics based on their personal experiences in England and the Netherlands. Design/methodology/approach This study provides valuable insights into how Muslim leadership experiences socio-political realities from own perspectives. The comparative analysis of Muslim leadership in England and the Netherlands highlights the unique qualities of each community, while also demonstrating shared communal awareness regarding political participation and concerns regarding the rise of Islamophobia and populism. Findings The study reveals significant differences between Dutch and British Muslim leadership regarding attitudes toward politics. While the Dutch political system enables minorities to have political parties, British leaders prefer peaceful resistance, internal cooperation and voting power for influence. Muslim communities in both countries face similar challenges, such as access to politics, rising Islamophobia and populism. However, there are variations in leadership maturity and attitudes toward communal unification and political participation. Research limitations/implications Especially Dutch Muslims were much more open toward cooperation once approached. The biggest challenge was to get into the Muslim communities in England. Even though British Muslims showed a much greater aptitude toward their civic duties, British Muslims were much more careful and wished that interviews were written down instead of being recorded. But once the author was part of the community, community leaders were more accepting and tolerant towards the author's presence. From that point on, to be recommended (snowballing) became easier. Practical implications This research shows clearly how different ethnic Muslim communities differ across two different countries. Even though both countries have their own advantages and disadvantages, understanding how civic responsibilities and the progressive development of minority attitudes can be best approached is important to policymakers. Social implications One major social implication is the way minorities perceive social and political equality and how these minority expectations can be met. Research shows that there is much fear and anxiety to growing sentiments of populism and right-wing appraisals. For a better integration and inclusion, a sound assessment of social and religious expectations is crucial. Originality/value As far as the author knows, there are no qualitative research studies that compare Muslim minority conditions in the Netherlands and England. This research makes this even more interesting for how to create policy that contributes to a European understanding of Muslim existence in Europe and a common European identity. This is crucial for a more stable and stronger European future.

Similar Contexts, Different Behaviour: Explaining the Non-Linear Moderation and Immoderation of Islamic Political Parties in Jordan, Morocco, Tunisia, and Turkey

“Islamic Moderation” in Perspectives: A Comparison Between Oriental and Occidental Scholarships

Rethinking Islamist politics in North Africa: a multi-level analysis of domestic, regional and international dynamics

Islamic Parties between Sacred and Profane: Transformation of the Concept of Party in the Muslim Political Discourse

A comparative study on the perceptions of Dutch and British Muslim leadership regarding social-political challenges

The Nature of Emerging Political Parties and Its Impact on Political Institutions, Kurdistan Region as a Case Study

Erdoğan and the Muslim Brotherhood: an outside-in approach to Turkish foreign policy in the Middle East

Is pro-environmentalism a privilege? Country development factors as moderators of socio-psychological drivers of pro-environmental behavior

Mainstreaming Religious Moderation in the Digital Space: An Examination of Islami.co Web Portal in the Perspective of Jürgen Habermas’ Communicative Rationality

Towards Intersectional Moderation: An Alternative Model of Moderation Built on Care and Power

Between Exclusivism and Inclusivism: The Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood’s Divided Reponses to the “Arab Spring”

Role of New Opinion Leaders on Social Media in Political and Religious Polarization (Jordanian case study).

A dynamic model of party membership and ideologies

ole of New Opinion Leaders on Social Media in Political and Religious Polarization (Jordanian case study)

Religious Conscience or Religious Freedom? The Difference between Official Constitutional Norms and Actual Legal Restrictions in Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia

“Not See the Forest for the Trees.” The Significance of Context in Media Monitoring Capabilities from a Comparative Perspective

Consolidating and Contesting Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Towards a Framework

Navigating underrepresentation and gendered barriers to women's political power: Narratives and experiences of women parliamentarians in Turkey

From Realist Billiard Balls and Liberal Concentric Circles to Global IR’s Venn Diagram? Rethinking International Relations via Turkey’s Centennial

Contextualism in Normative Political Theory and the Problem of Critical Distance

The Narrative Foundations of Radical and Deradicalizing Online Discursive Spaces: A Comparison of the Cases of Generation Islam and Jamal al-Khatib in Germany