Abstract:Abstract We use machine learning algorithms (artificial neural networks, ANNs) to estimate petrophysical models at seismic scale combining well-log information, seismic data and seismic attributes. The resulting petrophysical images are the prior inputs in the process of full-waveform inversion (FWI). We calculate seismic attributes from a stacked reflected 2-D seismic section and then train ANNs to approximate the following petrophysical parameters: P-wave velocity ( $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p ), density ( $$\rho $$ ρ ) and volume of clay ( $$V_\mathrm{{clay}}$$ V clay ). We extend the use of the $$V_\mathrm{{clay}}$$ V clay by constraining it with the well lithology and we establish two classes: sands and shales. Consequently, machine learning allows us to build an initial estimate of the earth property model ( $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p ), which is iteratively refined to produce a synthetic seismogram that matches the observed seismic data. We apply the 1-D Kennett method as a forward modeling tool to create synthetic data with the images of $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p , $$\rho $$ ρ and the thickness of layers (sands or shales) obtained with the ANNs. A nonlinear least-squares inversion algorithm minimizes the residual (or misfit) between observed and synthetic full-waveform data, which improves the $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p resolution. In order to show the advantage of using the ANN velocity model as the initial velocity model for the inversion, we compare the results obtained with the ANNs and two other initial velocity models. One of these alternative initial velocity models is computed via P-wave impedance, and the other is achieved by velocity semblance analysis: root-mean-square velocity (RMS). The results are in good agreement when we use $$\rho $$ ρ and $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p obtained by ANNs. However, the results are poor and the synthetic data do not match the real acquired data when using the semblance velocity model and the $$\rho $$ ρ from the well log (constant for the entire 2-D section). Nevertheless, the results improve when including $$\rho $$ ρ , the layered structure driven by the $$V_\mathrm{{clay}}$$ V clay (both obtained with ANNs) and the semblance velocity model. When doing inversion starting with the initial $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p model estimated using the P-wave impedance, there is some gain of the final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p with respect to the RMS initial $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p . To assess the quality of the inversion of $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p , we use the information for two available wells and compare the final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p obtained with ANNs and the final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p computed with the P-wave impedance. This shows the benefit of employing ANNs estimations as prior models during the inversion process to obtain a final $$V_\mathrm{{p}}$$ V p that is in agreement with the geology and with the seismic and well-log data. To illustrate the computation of the final velocity model via FWI, we provide an algorithm with the detailed steps and its corresponding GitHub code.

Direct prediction of petrophysical and petroelastic reservoir properties from seismic and well-log data using nonlinear machine learning algorithms

Probabilistic physics-informed neural network for seismic petrophysical inversion#xD;

Comparison of neural networks techniques to predict subsurface parameters based on seismic inversion: a machine learning approach

A Comparison of Machine Learning Methods to Predict Porosity in Carbonate Reservoirs from Seismic-Derived Elastic Properties

Improving Reservoir Characterization and Prediction Via Machine Learning-Driven Integration of Subseismic Geologic Concepts, Geophysical Attributes, and Wells

Generalization with Reverse-Calibration of Well and Seismic Data Using Machine Learning Methods for Complex Reservoirs Predicting During Early-Stage Geological Exploration Oil Field

Data Driven Modeling and Prediction for Reservoir Characterization Using Seismic Attribute Analyses and Big Data Analytics

Prediction of Geo-mechanical Parameter Logs from Petrophysical Well Logs using Machine Learning Approach

Novel hybrid machine learning optimizer algorithms to prediction of fracture density by petrophysical data

Analysis of Machine Learning Models for Prediction of Petrophysical Data

Rock-physics-driven Nonlinear Seismic Inversion for Petrophysical Parameters of Reservoir

Machine learning assisted Kriging to capture spatial variability in petrophysical property modelling

A Deep Learning Framework for Petrophysical Properties Prediction in Gas Reservoirs

Multidimensional Petrophysical Seismic Inversion Based on Knowledge-Driven Semi-Supervised Deep Learning

The Power of Predictive Analytics in Oil Field Development: Integrating Machine Learning with Reservoir Hydrocarbon Data to Enable Enhanced Oil Recovery of Hugin Formation within the Theta Vest Structure

Petrophysical Property Estimation from Seismic Data Using Recurrent Neural Networks

Decorrelated Linearized Seismic-Petrophysics Inversion.

Reservoir Prediction by Machine Learning Methods on The Well Data and Seismic Attributes for Complex Coastal Conditions

Machine Learning and Seismic Attributes for Petroleum Prospect Generation and Evaluation: An Example from Offshore Australia

Optimizing seismic-based reservoir property prediction: a synthetic data-driven approach using convolutional neural networks and transfer learning with real data integration

Machine Learning as a Seismic Prior Velocity Model Building Method for Full-Waveform Inversion: A Case Study from Colombia