Abstract:Introduction: This paper examines one of the NHS England Pioneers programmes of Integrated Care, which was implemented in three localities in East London, covering the area served by one of the largest hospital groups in the UK and bringing together commissioners, providers and local authorities. The partners agreed to build a model of integrated care that focused on the whole person. This qualitative and participatory evaluation looked at how an ambitious vision translated into the delivery of integrated care on the ground. The study explored the micro-mechanisms of integrated care relationships based on the experience of health and social care professionals working in acute and community care settings. Methods: We employed a participatory approach, the Researcher in Residence model, whereby the researcher was embedded in the organisations she evaluated and worked alongside managers and clinicians to build collaboration across the full range of stakeholders, develop shared learning, and find common ground through competing interests, while trying to address power imbalances. A number of complementary qualitative methods of data generation were used, including documentary analysis, participant observations, semi-structured interviews, and coproduction workshops with frontline health and social care professionals to interpret the data and develop recommendations. Results: Our fieldwork exposed persistent organisational fragmentation, despite the dominant rhetoric of integration and efforts to build a shared vision at senior governance levels. The evaluation identified several important themes, including: a growing barrier between acute and community services; a persisting difficulty experienced by health and social care staff in working together because of professional and cultural differences, as well as conflicting organisational priorities and guidelines; and a lack of capacity and support to deliver a genuine multidisciplinary approach in practice, despite the ethos of multiagency being embraced widely. Discussion: By focusing on professionals' working routines, we detailed how and why action taken by organisational leaders failed to have tangible impact. The inability to align organisational priorities and guidelines on the ground, as well as a failure to acknowledge the impact of structural incentives for organisations to compete at the expense of cooperation, in a context of limited financial and human resources, acted as barriers to more coordinated working. Within an environment of continuous reconfigurations, staff were often confused about the functions of new services and did not feel they had influence on change processes. Investing in a genuine bottom-up approach could ensure that the range of activities needed to generate system-wide cultural transformation reflect the capacity of the organisations and systems and address genuine local needs. Limitations: The authors acknowledge several limitations of this study, including the focus on one geographical area, East London, and the timing of the evaluation, with several new interventions and programmes introduced more or less simultaneously. Some of the intermediate care services under evaluation were still at pilot stage and some teams were undergoing new reconfigurations, reflecting the fast-pace of change of the past decade. This created confusion at times, for instance when discussing specific roles and activities with participants. We tried to address some of these challenges by organising several workshops with different teams to co-interpret and discuss the findings.

Comparative case studies in integrated care implementation from across the globe: a quest for action

Global Approaches to Integrated Care: Best Practices and Ongoing Innovation.

Identification of implementation enhancement strategies for national comprehensive care standards using the CFIR-ERIC approach: a qualitative study

Optimization of Care Pathways Through Technological, Clinical, Organizational and Social Innovations: A Qualitative Study

International research priorities for integrated care and cross-boundary working: an electronic Delphi study

Integrating: A managerial practice that enables implementation in fragmented health care environments

Implementation of Integrated Care in Singapore: A Complex Adaptive System Perspective

Evaluation of integrated care services in Catalonia: population-based and service-based real-life deployment protocols

Barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices: a mixed methods study

How the Integration of Telehealth and Coordinated Care Approaches Impact Health Care Service Organization Structure and Ethos: Mixed Methods Study

Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis

Unpacking the design, implementation and uptake of community-integrated health care services: a critical realist synthesis

A postgraduate curriculum for integrated care: a qualitative exploration of trainee paediatricians and general practitioners’ experiences

(Dis)Integrated Care? Lessons from East London

A qualitative study of diverse providers' behaviour in response to commissioners, patients and innovators in England: research protocol

Innovative models of care for the health facility of the future: a protocol for a mixed-methods study to elicit consumer and provider views

Describing a programme of implementation‐effectiveness research on the organization and implementation of frontline nursing care delivery into diverse heath systems

Integrated care models in Swiss primary care: An embedded multiple case study

Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis

The Core Dimensions of Integrated Care: A Literature Review to Support the Development of a Comprehensive Framework for Implementing Integrated Care

Evaluating the implementation of interdisciplinary patient-centred care intervention for people with multimorbidity in primary care: a qualitative study