Do we really need more new biomarkers for cardiovascular risk prediction?

Peter M Nilsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319893050
IF: 8.526
2019-12-03
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Abstract:Accurate risk prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is of importance not only for the individual at risk, but also for the treating physician as well as the health care system in general, to make estimates of unmet needs for preventive efforts in a defined population. Traditionally, we have used clinical experience and personal knowledge of the individual if he or she is already a patient within the health care system coming for a consultation visit. Another aspect is to meet people from the population participating in health screening projects or coming in for a simplified health survey, sometimes paid for by themselves or their employer. Over the years, different risk algorithms have been developed and tested in European populations, from the modified Framingham Risk Score (FRS) to the updated European SCORE system, and including other systems in the UK. Some of these are discussed in recent guidelines in Europe<sup><a class="ref showRefEvent2" href="#">1</a></sup> and the US.<sup><a class="ref showRefEvent2" href="#">2</a></sup> Traditionally, these algorithms have been based on variables such us age, sex, blood pressure, smoking and lipid levels, but other risk markers have also been used when available, such as left ventricular hypertrophy in FRS, or lipid fractions other than total cholesterol. Background information on diabetes and family history should often be taken into consideration but are not quantified.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?