Augmented Reality Through the Lens of Eye Tracking

Sheree Josephson,Melina Myers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2019.1679636
2019-10-02
Visual Communication Quarterly
Abstract:<i>This eye-tracking study compared the usability of Yelp's Augmented Reality application Monocle with its familiar map-based app. Thirty participants (15 in each group) had to find a location in an outdoor mall using one version of the mobile Yelp app while wearing a pair of eye-tracking glasses that recorded the general area of the natural environment or smartphone their eyes focused on. Results showed that AR users could successfully arrive at the destination using the location-based technology that augments a visual display of the physical landscape with digital information. However, Augmented Reality users took longer to find the location than did map users. They also spent more time looking at the mobile smartphone and looked back and forth between the screen and the environment more often than map users. In open-ended questions about preference following the task, 14 of 15 in the AR group said they would likely use the Monocle app in the future to find a location because they could "see exactly" where something was or hated following directions. Since users successfully used this technology and reported enjoying its use, further development of AR for everyday use to complete tasks is encouraged. However, future studies should focus not only on the development of technology but its usability and employ visual communication theories such as Perception Theory (<span class="ref-lnk"><a href="#">Barry, 2005</a><span class="ref-overlay scrollable-ref"> <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor">Barry, <span class="NLM_given-names">A. M.</span></span> (<span class="NLM_year">2005</span>). <span class="NLM_chapter-title">Perception theory</span>. In <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor"><span class="NLM_given-names">K.</span> Smith</span>, <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor"><span class="NLM_given-names">S.</span> Moriarty</span>, <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor"><span class="NLM_given-names">G.</span> Barbatsis</span>, &amp; <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor"><span class="NLM_given-names">K.</span> Kenney</span> (eds.), <i>Handbook of visual communication: Theory, methods, and media</i> (pp. <span class="NLM_fpage">45</span>–<span class="NLM_lpage">62</span>). <span class="NLM_publisher-loc">Mahweh, NJ/London, UK</span>: <span class="NLM_publisher-name">Lawrence Erlbaum</span>.<span class="ref-links"> <span class="googleScholar-container"><a class="google-scholar" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&amp;publication_year=2005&amp;pages=45-62&amp;author=A.+M.+Barry&amp;title=Perception+theory">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>) and Information Processing Theory (i.e., <span class="ref-lnk"><a href="#">Krause, 1982</a><span class="ref-overlay scrollable-ref"> <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor">Krause, <span class="NLM_given-names">W.</span></span> (<span class="NLM_year">1982</span>). <span class="NLM_chapter-title">Eye fixations and three-term series problems, or: Is there evidence for task independent information units.</span> In <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor"><span class="NLM_given-names">R.</span> Groner</span> &amp; <span class="hlFld-ContribAuthor"><span class="NLM_given-names">P.</span> Fraisse</span> (eds.), <i>Cognition and eye movements</i> (pp. <span class="NLM_fpage">122</span>–<span class="NLM_lpage">138</span>). <span class="NLM_publisher-loc">Amsterdam, The Netherlands/Berlin, Germany</span>: <span class="NLM_publisher-name">North Holland/Deutscher Verlag der Wissesnschaften</span> (<span class="NLM_edition">joint edition</span>).<span class="ref-links"> <span class="googleScholar-container"><a class="google-scholar" href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?hl=en&amp;publication_year=1982&amp;pages=122-138&amp;author=W.+Krause&amp;title=Eye+fixations+and+three-term+series+problems%2C+or%3A+Is+there+evidence+for+task+independent+information+units.">[Google Scholar]</a></span></span></span></span>) to help understand users' behavior.</i>
What problem does this paper attempt to address?