Nalmefene hydrochloride intervention operation application observation of anesthesia in the department of neurosurgery
Jiang-tao NIU,Chang-jun GAO,Xu-de SUN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2014.12.040
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective Through the Department of Neurosurgery interventional treatment of nalmefene hydrochloride after use(Liao Ning Heisco) antagonist opioid drugs,let patients in early recovery of nervous function and judgment on it,to find early some may be due to the complications caused by interventional therapy,so early treatment,improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients to observe clinical effects of nalmefene hydrochloride and safety of patients. Methods Interventional treatment in 90 patients under general anesthesia for Department of Neurosurgery,male 49 cases,female 41 cases,age 35- 66 years old,America anesthesiologists(ASA)Ⅱ- Ⅲ,were randomly divided into two groups,no spontaneous breathing in patients after interventional operation after operation,call not or there are breathing but 6 ml /kg tidal volume,respiratory rate slower than 12 bpm,SpO2 can not maintain in 90% above. Neostigmine(0. 02 mg /kg) and atropine(0. 01 mg /kg) antagonist muscle relaxation,group N was treated with nalmefene hydrochloride 0. 25 μg /kg intravenous injection,5 min after such as have not achieved the desired results can be appended nalmefene,cumulative dose is less than 1 μg /kg. As indications for extubation of tracheal extubation,and observe the 30 min in anesthesia recovery room. NN group was not rest with intravenous injection of nalmefene. Observation:The monitoring and recording the basic value,after the operation ends(extubation time),5 min after extubation HR,MAP,SpO2,and observe the time,extubation Ramsay score,postoperative agitation,nausea and vomiting in patients with 5 min,awake pain visual analog scale consciousness awakening and extubation(VSA). Results In N group the consciousness recovery time was(5. 6 ± 1. 7)min,extubation time was(8. 2 ± 2. 3) min,Ramsay after extubation was(2. 4 ± 0. 8) scores,NN group consciousness recovery time was(11. 2 ± 2. 1) min,extubation time was(13. 4 ± 3. 6) min,Ramsay after extubation was(13. 4 ± 3. 6)scores;N group consciousness recovery time,extubation time,extubation Ramsay score than group NN were statistically significant(P 0. 05). But the pain visual analogue score of two group had no statistical significance(P 0. 05). Conclusion Nalmefene hydrochloride had anesthesia antagonistic opioid drug effect in interventional operation and was safety.