Abstract:Sensitivity analysis (SA) is a commonly used approach for identifying important parameters that dominate model behaviors. We use a newly developed software package, a Problem Solving environment for Uncertainty Analysis and Design Exploration (PSUADE), to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of ten widely used SA methods, including seven qualitative and three quantitative ones. All SA methods are tested using a variety of sampling techniques to screen out the most sensitive (i.e., important) parameters from the insensitive ones. The Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting (SAC-SMA) model, which has thirteen tunable parameters, is used for illustration. The South Branch Potomac River basin near Springfield, West Virginia in the U.S. is chosen as the study area. The key findings from this study are: (1) For qualitative SA methods, Correlation Analysis (CA), Regression Analysis (RA), and Gaussian Process (GP) screening methods are shown to be not effective in this example. Morris One-At-a-Time (MOAT) screening is the most efficient, needing only 280 samples to identify the most important parameters, but it is the least robust method. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS), Delta Test (DT) and Sum-Of-Trees (SOT) screening methods need about 400–600 samples for the same purpose. Monte Carlo (MC), Orthogonal Array (OA) and Orthogonal Array based Latin Hypercube (OALH) are appropriate sampling techniques for them; (2) For quantitative SA methods, at least 2777 samples are needed for Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test (FAST) to identity parameter main effect. McKay method needs about 360 samples to evaluate the main effect, more than 1000 samples to assess the two-way interaction effect. OALH and LPτ (LPTAU) sampling techniques are more appropriate for McKay method. For the Sobol' method, the minimum samples needed are 1050 to compute the first-order and total sensitivity indices correctly. These comparisons show that qualitative SA methods are more efficient but less accurate and robust than quantitative ones.

The role of sensitivity analysis in the building performance analysis: A critical review

An Integrated Sensitivity Analysis Method for Energy and Comfort Performance of an Office Building along the Chinese Coastline

Building Energy Assessment Based on a Sequential Sensitivity Analysis Approach

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Various Sensitivity Analysis Methods: A Case Study with a Hydrological Model

An Efficient Approach to the Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis of Building Performance: OPAT-based LSA and Sobol-based GSA

Building Energy Simulation and Its Application for Building Performance Optimization: A Review of Methods, Tools, and Case Studies

[Comment on Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Environmental Models].

Parametric Study of Passive Design Strategies for High-Rise Residential Buildings in Hot and Humid Climates: Miscellaneous Impact Factors

A review of data-driven building performance analysis and design on big on-site building performance data

Application of sensitivity analysis in building energy simulations: combining first and second order elementary effects Methods

A review of BIM integration withbuilding performance analysis in the project life-cycle 1

Study on Global Sensitivity Analysis Method

Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis of building energy demand model based on occupant behaviors

Integrating BIM with building performance analysis in project life-cycle

Sensitivity Analysis of Design Parameters of Envelope Enclosure Performance in the Dry-Hot and Dry-Cold Areas

Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of cooling and heating loads for building energy planning

Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Design Under Uncertainty

Developing A Meta-Model for Sensitivity Analyses and Prediction of Building Performance for Passively Designed High-Rise Residential Buildings

Single-factor Sensitivity Analysis of Input Parameters in an Energy Model of Prototypical Office Building

Investigating Building Sustainability by Applying Sensitivity Analysis of Impact Factors During Design Stage

Assessment of Parametric Sensitivity Analysis Methods Based on A Quasi Two-Dimensional Groundwater Model