Tariffs will test not reconfigure global supply chains

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/oxan-ga236726

2018-08-09

Abstract:The United States and China are imposing tariffs on over 50 billion dollars of the other’s imports -- and threaten more

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

When Tariffs Disrupt Global Supply Chains

Gene M. Grossman,Elhanan Helpman,Stephen J. Redding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20211519

IF: 10.7

2024-04-01

American Economic Review

Abstract:We study unanticipated tariffs in a setting with firm-to-firm supply relationships. Firms conduct costly searches and negotiate with potential suppliers that pass a reservation level of match productivity. Global supply chains form in anticipation of free trade. Then, the home government surprises with an input tariff. This can lead to renegotiation with initial suppliers or search for replacements. Calibrating the model’s parameters to match initial import shares and the estimated responses to the US tariffs imposed on China, we find an overall welfare loss of 0.12 percent of GDP, with substantial contributions from changes in input sourcing and search costs. (JEL D72, F13, F14, L14, O19, P33)

economics
Protectionist threats jeopardise international trade: Chinese evidence for Trump’s policies

M Crowley,Huasheng Song,Ning Meng

2017-01-01

Abstract:The Trump administration’s announcement of its intention to impose a 20% tax on goods imported from Mexico and its calls for a 45% import tariff on goods from China have alarmed businesses and consumers alike. This column uses data on the foreign market entry decisions of Chinese firms to assess the impact that tariff scares and trade policy uncertainty have on trade flows. The evidence suggests that Trump's threats to raise tariffs can reduce US imports even if the administration doesn't follow through with the threatened tax increases.
Multi-product Exporters in US–China Trade War

Hua-Sheng Song,Xue-Qian Zheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2022.2103508

IF: 1.916

2022-01-01

Applied Economics

Abstract:This study explores empirically how Chinese multi-product firms adjust their exports in response to the U.S. tariff escalations during the US-China trade war, using firm-product-level customs trade data from China. We find strong evidence for a new phenomenon we call the within-firm cross-product chilling effect, whereby an additional tariff targeting some of the firm's products sold in the destination market is associated with reduced sales of its other untargeted products in that market. The comparison between firm-product-level and product-level analysis suggests that ignoring the within-firm chilling effect would result in a severe underestimation of the tariff effects. Moreover, the chilling effect is more prominent for products that are more important for a firm's overall sales to the U.S. and that are highly reliant on the U.S. market. We also observe a 'complete tariff pass-through' phenomenon at firm-product level, which complements the product-level evidence in previous related studies.
Globally Chained Economies, Unwitting Victims of the US‐China Trade War

Jie Wu,Chan-Guk Huh,Jacob Wood

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apel.12334

2021-01-01

Asian-Pacific Economic Literature

Abstract:The USA and China have been engaged in a trade war since 2018—an economic tussle that has had repercussions for not only the two countries directly involved but also for their trading partners participating in the industrial global value chains (GVC). To assess the gravity of the dispute, we measure the impacts of the US‐China bilateral tariff hikes on the participants, as well on their trading partners linked by global supply chains, whose structure is estimated using the OECD Inter‐Country Input–Output Model. Our assessment relies on two metrics: the effective rate of protection (ERP) and total factor productivity (TFP). We calculate ERPs following a methodology that reflects the globally fragmented production linkages. From our assessments, the tariff increases raised the ERPs of the warring countries but lowered those of their trading partners. Moreover, the bilateral tariff hikes significantly raised the input tariffs of many major trading partners through the transmission of GVCs. Consequently, the TFPs of the major trading countries are likely to fall by 0.16 to 0.41 per cent.
The 2018 US-China trade conflict after forty years of special protection

Chad P. Bown

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17538963.2019.1608047

2019-04-29

China Economic Journal

Abstract:In 2018, the United States suddenly increased tariffs on nearly 50 percent of its imports from China. China immediately responded with tariff retaliation covering more than 70 percent of imports from the United States. This article assesses what happened in 2018 and attempts to explain why. It first constructs new measure of special tariff protection to put the sheer scope and coverage of the 2018 actions into historical context. It then uses the lens provided by the 2018 special tariffs to explain the key sources of economic and policy friction between the two countries. This includes whether China's state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and industrial subsidies, as well as China's development strategy and system of forcibly acquiring foreign technology, were imposing increasingly large costs on trading partners. Finally, it also examines whether the US strategy to provoke a crisis – which may result in a severely weakened World Trade Organization (WTO) – was deliberate and out of frustration with the institution itself.
Trade-war Tariffs and Supply Chain Trade

Deborah L. Swenson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00885

2024-01-01

Asian Economic Papers

Abstract:Abstract Although Chinese exports to the United States hit an all-time high in 2022, it would be incorrect to conclude that the U.S.–China trade war had no effects on trade. By exploiting fine product-level information on trade war tariffs, this paper demonstrates how the trade war diminished China's exports to the United States in tariff-impeded products, while expanding opportunities for exports from other countries in a fashion that had some systematic characteristics. First, the impact of the trade war tariffs was not immediate, as trade responses took place with a lag. Second, the responses to trade-war tariffs were heterogenous across countries and regions, with finer distinctions by product categories. Finally, trade that could be viewed as highly tied to global value chains (GVCs), such as trade in information and communication technology products, exhibited stronger reactions to the imposition of trade-war tariffs. These responses, and their implications for the organization of global supply chains, are discussed considering current trade concerns.

economics
The Day after Tomorrow: Evaluating the Burden of Trump's Trade War

Meixin Guo,Lin Lu,Liugang Sheng,Miaojie Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00592

2018-01-01

Asian Economic Papers

Abstract:During his U.S. presidential campaign Donald Trump threatened China with the imposition of high import tariffs on its exports to the United States. To evaluate the repercussions of such an action, this paper uses Eaton and Kortum's 2002 multi-sector, multi-country general equilibrium model with intersectional linkages to forecast how exports, imports, output, and real wages would change if Trump's threat of 45 percent tariffs is carried out. To view plausible scenarios, we evaluate the case of a unilateral action on the part of the United States, as well as a scenario where China retaliates by imposing an equally high 45 percent tariff on its imports from the United States. In addition, because the high U.S. trade deficit with China is a factor that underpins calls for tariff action, we explore simulations where the trade balance is restored to balance as well as a scenario in which the trade balance is unchanged. In all of the scenarios, the calibration exercise suggests that a trade war triggered by high U.S. import tariffs will lead to a collapse in U.S.–China bilateral trade. In all of the scenarios, the United States will experience large social welfare losses, whereas China may lose or gain slightly depending on the effect of trade war on the U.S.–China trade balance. Globally, some small open economies may experience small benefits, while other countries may suffer collateral damage.
When Tari¤s Disrupt Global Supply Chains

M. Grossman

Abstract:We study unanticipated tari¤s in a setting with rm-to-rm supply relationships. Firms that produce di¤erentiated products conduct costly searches for potential input suppliers and negotiate bilateral prices with those that pass a reservation level of match productivity. Global supply chains are formed in anticipation of free trade. Once they are in place, the home government surprises with an input tari¤. This can lead to renegotiation with initial suppliers or search for replacements. Calibrating the models parameters to the estimated price and quantity responses to the Trump tari¤s on imports from China, we nd a loss of welfare of just under 0.5% of GDP, an improvement of 2% in the U.S. terms of trade with China, and a deterioration of about 0.4% in the overall U.S. terms of trade. Keywords: global supply chains, global value chains, input tari¤s, imported intermediate goods JEL Classication: F13, F12 We are grateful to Pol Antràs, Harald Fadinger, Chaim Fershtman, Jerry Green, Faruk Gul, Gregor Jarosch, Edi Karni, Robin Lee, Mihai Manea, Emanuel Ornelas, Gianmarco Ottaviano, Richard Rogerson, Dan Treer, the editor, and four referees for helpful comments and suggestions and to Chad Bown for kindly sharing his tari¤ data. Benjamin Niswonger, Nan Xiang, and Xiang Zhang provided superb research assistance.

Economics
Is US trade policy reshaping global supply chains?

Caroline Freund,Aaditya Mattoo,Alen Mulabdic,Michele Ruta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2024.104011

IF: 3.712

2024-10-11

Journal of International Economics

Abstract:This paper examines the reshaping of supply chains using detailed US 10-digit import data between 2017 and 2022. The results show that while US-China decoupling in bilateral trade is real, supply chains remain intertwined with China. Over the period, China's share of US imports fell from 22 % to 16 % as a result of US tariffs. US imports from China are being replaced with imports from large, developing countries with revealed comparative advantage in a product. In strategic industries, countries replacing China tend to be deeply integrated in China's supply chains and are experiencing faster import growth from China. Put differently, to displace China on the export side, countries must embrace China's supply chains. There is no consistent evidence of reshoring but evidence of nearshoring to border nations. Despite the significant reshaping, China remained the top supplier of directly imported goods to the US in 2022.

economics
The Return of Protectionism: Prospects for Sino-US Trade Relations in the Wake of the Trade War

Hong Ma,Jingxin Ning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceqi.2024.09.003

2024-01-01

China Economic Quarterly International

Abstract:Over the past six years, the Sino-US trade war has not only reshaped the relationship between the world's two largest economies but also profoundly influenced the global economic and trade patterns. This paper reviews the background, process, and implications of the Sino-US trade war, examining its impact on China, the United States, and the broader global trade landscape across various socioeconomic dimensions. We begin by reviewing the development of Sino-US trade relations in the past 20 years. Next we detail the background and evolution of the trade war. We then discuss the economic consequences of the conflict, including the effect of tariff increases on product prices, employment, investment, consumption, and welfare. Finally, we explore the reshaping of supply chains in the aftermath of the trade conflict, and the interaction between trade policies and industrial policies within the context of the Sino-US trade war.Existing literature indicates that the Sino-US trade war has resulted in significant welfare losses for both countries, with surprisingly little impact on employment. The tariffs have not achieved the intended outcome set by policymakers. Specifically, the additional tariffs imposed by the United States on China have neither effectively addressed trade imbalances nor brought manufacturing jobs back onshore. Our paper offers a new perspective on the complexity of the current international trade conflict.
The Global Value Chain and Welfare Effects of Tariffs—Counterfactual Analysis of Sino–US Economic and Trade Frictions

Mengzhou Qin,Zijie Fan,Yuan Zhong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148280

IF: 3.9

2022-07-06

Sustainability

Abstract:This paper aims to study the impact of Sino–US (China–United States) trade frictions on global value chains and welfare changes. We introduce the general equilibrium model for multi-country and multi-sector heterogeneous enterprises and combine it with an input–output structure. The results show that the additional tariffs on China and the US reduce bilateral trade and affect the overall imports and exports of both countries to varying degrees. The results show that the additional tariffs on China and the US affect both countries' overall imports and exports to varying degrees. The impact of the trade of manufactured goods is greater than that of the trade of intermediate goods. The welfare effect in China has dropped by 0.163%, while the corresponding effect in the US has improved by 0.016%. The main reason for the decline in China's welfare is the deterioration of the terms of trade. Increased tariffs between China and the US can reduce bilateral trade between the two countries, particularly in intermediate goods, and can cause a reorganization of global value chains in both regions.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
From System Assumption to Trade Policy:Obstacle of the U.S Carbon Tariff Transformation

Wang Jun

2011-01-01

Abstract:The U.S. tries to establish carbon tariff system in climate change legislation, applying border tax to energy-intensive products from those that fail to adopt emission reduction. Based on the review of the theoretical studies on carbon tariff, the author analyzed the obstacles that the U.S. confronts in transforming carbon tariff from system assumption to trade policy. The public concern about possible economic slowdown, the influence of climate change legislation, and the games among various interest groups prevent carbon tariff becoming a trade policy; furthermore, if so, it would violate the principle of non-discrimination and the General exceptions in WTO which makes it lack of legitimate ground. Thus, China should plan ahead and deal with it calmly.
The impacts of the U.S.–China trade war

Gordon H. Hanson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s11369-020-00163-7

2020-02-05

Business Economics

Abstract:The trade war has received an enormous amount of attention. Its impacts today have been limited because the U.S. and China have been a bit restrained. Lots of firms have gotten exceptions to these tariffs and there have been lots of delays in their full implementation. It's also been the case that U.S. firms have been delaying making adjustments to their global value chains. What has been striking is that the impact of tariffs on U.S. prices has been one-for-one. These tariffs are unlikely to have a significant impact on manufacturing employment in the United States: the job loss that we observed as a consequence of import competition from China came primarily from factory closure, furthermore U.S. tariffs didn't target all U.S. imports. They targeted imports from China. Looking forward, to the extent the trade war is dampening GDP growth in China, itcould happen political consequences at home. As for us, this is a defining moment in which we're going to see whether the U.S. is willing to maintain its commitments to more open borders.
The Impact of Tariff Trade Barriers on the Operating Performance of U.S. Firms: The Role of Supply Structure and Complexity

Yi Zhou,Hong,Di Fan

Abstract:Multinational corporations (MNCs) have benefited tremendously from free trade in the past few decades in the form of cost reductions, resource advantages, and market expansion. However, the dynamism of international relations and a global recession have rekindled the debate over frictionless trade. In this study, we examine how trade friction, created by tariff trade barriers, affects the operational performance of domestic firms. We also investigate how different supply chain characteristics and strategies can moderate the impact of such trade friction. Motivated by the 2018 U.S.-China trade war, we conducted a difference-in-difference analysis to examine the impact of trade tariffs on various firm performance indicators of U.S. firms. We find that U.S. firms with direct supply chain partners (i.e., first-tier suppliers) in China have worse performance in terms of inventory (days of supply) and profitability (ROA). We further show that the negative impact on firms’ profitability is more severe when firms have a lower degree of vertical integration and when firms have a higher degree of horizonal, spatial, and cooperative supply base complexity. We discuss the implications for international operations management, supply chain networks, and supply risk management, and provide suggestions to supply chain practitioners and trade policy makers.

Economics,Business
Product Adjustments of Multi-Product Exporters: Evidence from Us-China Trade War

Huasheng Song,Xueqian ZHENG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3972729

2021-01-01

Abstract:The unexpected and unprecedented trade war between the United States and China presents an ideal natural experiment to evaluate the impacts of trade protectionist policies on exporters. This study will explore how multi-product firms adjust their exports in response to the U.S. tariff escalations during the US-China trade war by using firm-level customs trade data of Chinese exporters from January 2018 to June 2019. We find strong evidence of a destruction effect on tariffed products and a chilling effect on non-tariffed products in affected firms, both of which are more pronounced for core products. We also observe an increasing product scope and an increasingly even product-mix distribution for affected exporters.
Global Supply Chains: The Looming “Great Reallocation”

Laura Alfaro,Davin Chor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4567667

2023-01-01

SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract:Global supply chains have come under unprecedented stress as a result of US-China trade tensions, the Covid-19 pandemic, and geopolitical shocks. We document shifts in the pattern of US participation in global value chains over the last four decades, in terms of partner countries, products, and modes, with a focus on the last five years (2017-2022). The available data point to a looming “great reallocation” in supply chain activity: Direct US sourcing from China has decreased, with low-wage locations (principally: Vietnam) and nearshoring/friendshoring alternatives (notably: Mexico) gaining in import share. The production line positioning of the US’ imports has also become more upstream, which is indicative of some reshoring of production stages. We sound several cautionary notes over the policies that have set this reallocation in motion: It is unclear if these measures will reduce US dependence on supply chains linked to China, and there are moreover already signs that prices of imports from Vietnam and Mexico are on the rise.Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.
The China–US Trade War: Deep‐Rooted Causes, Shifting Focus and Uncertain Prospects

Chi Hung Kwan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12284

IF: 3

2019-09-16

Asian Economic Policy Review

Abstract:<p>The USA has waged a trade war against China, whose rapid rise has come to be seen as a threat to US hegemony. Besides imposing additional tariffs on imported Chinese products, the USA is also tightening restrictions on the transfer of technology to China and the business activities of some Chinese high‐tech companies, notably Huawei. The escalation of the trade war into a tech war could lead to a decoupling between the US and Chinese economies, if not a world economy divided into two economic blocs that centered on them.</p>

economics
Trade Wars along the Global Value Chains

Jiandong Ju,Hong Ma,Zi Wang,Xiaodong Zhu

2018-01-01

Abstract:We propose a multi-sector, multi-factor Krugman model with production linkages to quantify the consequences of the recent US-China trade conflicts. The model emphasizes the importance of high-tech or strategic sectors that (i) are skilled-intensive, (ii) utilize skilled-intensive inputs, (iii) have low elasticities of substitution across varieties within sector, and (iv) are not or little substitutable in producing other products. Semiconductor industry, one example of these strategic sectors, has drawn substantial attention in the recent trade conflicts. Our quantification suggests that these strategic industries could suffer disproportionately from trade conflicts. Considering the role of strategic industries in the global value chains, we find that the proposed US-China tariff war would decrease the U.S. real income by 0.43 percent and the China’s real income by 0.36 percent.
Rising Import Tariffs, Falling Export Growth: When Modern Supply Chains Meet Old-Style Protectionism

Kyle Handley,Fariha Kamal,Ryan Monarch,,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17016/ifdp.2020.1270

2020-02-01

International Finance Discussion Paper

Abstract:We examine the impacts of the 2018-2019 U.S. import tariff increases on U.S. export growth through the lens of supply chain linkages. Using 2016 confidentia firm-trade linked data, we document the implied incidence and scope of new import tariffs. Firms that eventually faced tariff increases on their imports accounted for 84% of all exports and they represent 65% of manufacturing employment. For all affected firms, the implied cost is $900 per worker in new duties. To estimate the effect on U.S. export growth, we construct product-level measures of import tariff exposure of U.S. exports from the underlying firm micro data. More exposed products experienced 2 percentage point lower growth relative to products with no exposure. The decline in exports is equivalent to an ad valorem tariff on U.S. exports of almost 2% for the typical product and almost 4% for products with higher than average exposure.

English Else
US tariffs and trade confusion to persist post polls

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/oxan-db239402

2018-10-24

Abstract:Significance President Donald Trump's administration is pushing to reform the international trade system and bilateral trade arrangements with US partners to bolster US economic activity. The administration is also pushing to maintain US dominance in key sectors, particularly against China. Impacts Existing trade deals could limit the administration’s ability to isolate China via forthcoming US free trade deals. Trump’s freedom to make new free trade deals could be constrained if Democrats make gains in November’s midterm elections. Further emergency federal money may be needed to support retaliatory tariff-hit US voters.

Tariffs will test not reconfigure global supply chains

When Tariffs Disrupt Global Supply Chains

Protectionist threats jeopardise international trade: Chinese evidence for Trump’s policies

Multi-product Exporters in US–China Trade War

Globally Chained Economies, Unwitting Victims of the US‐China Trade War

The 2018 US-China trade conflict after forty years of special protection

Trade-war Tariffs and Supply Chain Trade

The Day after Tomorrow: Evaluating the Burden of Trump's Trade War

When Tari¤s Disrupt Global Supply Chains

Is US trade policy reshaping global supply chains?

The Return of Protectionism: Prospects for Sino-US Trade Relations in the Wake of the Trade War

The Global Value Chain and Welfare Effects of Tariffs—Counterfactual Analysis of Sino–US Economic and Trade Frictions

From System Assumption to Trade Policy:Obstacle of the U.S Carbon Tariff Transformation

The impacts of the U.S.–China trade war

The Impact of Tariff Trade Barriers on the Operating Performance of U.S. Firms: The Role of Supply Structure and Complexity

Product Adjustments of Multi-Product Exporters: Evidence from Us-China Trade War

Global Supply Chains: The Looming “Great Reallocation”

The China–US Trade War: Deep‐Rooted Causes, Shifting Focus and Uncertain Prospects

Trade Wars along the Global Value Chains

Rising Import Tariffs, Falling Export Growth: When Modern Supply Chains Meet Old-Style Protectionism

US tariffs and trade confusion to persist post polls